Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combining direct and indirect impacts to assess ecosystem service loss due to infrastructure construction.
Tardieu, Léa; Roussel, Sébastien; Thompson, John D; Labarraque, Dorothée; Salles, Jean-Michel.
Afiliação
  • Tardieu L; UMR 5474 LAMETA, Université Montpellier 1, Avenue Raymond Dugrand, F-34960 Montpellier, France. Electronic address: lea.tardieu@supagro.inra.fr.
  • Roussel S; UMR 5474 LAMETA, Université Montpellier 1, Avenue Raymond Dugrand, F-34960 Montpellier, France; Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, Route de Mende, F-34199 Montpellier, France.
  • Thompson JD; UMR 5175 CEFE, CNRS, 1919 Route de Mende, BP 5051, F-34033 Montpellier, France.
  • Labarraque D; Egis Structures & Environnement, 33-43, Avenue Georges Pompidou, F-31130 Balma, France.
  • Salles JM; UMR 5474 LAMETA, CNRS, 2 Place Viala, Bâtiment 26, F-34060 Montpellier, France.
J Environ Manage ; 152: 145-57, 2015 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25621389
ABSTRACT
The destruction of natural habitats and the associated loss of Ecosystem Services (ES) are rarely jointly assessed and quantified in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Based on a terrestrial transport infrastructure project, the objective of this paper is to quantify the potential loss of ES associated with direct and indirect impacts, and illustrate their contribution to decision-making for route options. We first quantify how much of each type of ES is generated by different land units in the absence of the infrastructure (baseline conditions). We then estimate ES loss caused by infrastructure construction in a way that discriminates among different types of ES and losses because some ES, in addition to losses that are directly proportional to the surface impacted, can show additional indirect losses associated with landscape connectivity. In addition, we illustrate how the assessment of threshold effects in particular ecosystem types that may be most sensitive to their occurrence can affect the estimation of ES loss. We compare implementation options to provide an example of how choices can be improved by assessing ES loss associated with a combination of direct and indirect impacts. This kind of analysis could be used more generally to assess development projects simply by adapting the framework of analysis to the type of project and the ecosystems concerned.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferrovias / Ecossistema / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferrovias / Ecossistema / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article