Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing for detection of EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer.
Pekar-Zlotin, Marina; Hirsch, Fred R; Soussan-Gutman, Lior; Ilouze, Maya; Dvir, Addie; Boyle, Theresa; Wynes, Murry; Miller, Vincent A; Lipson, Doron; Palmer, Gary A; Ali, Siraj M; Dekel, Shlomi; Brenner, Ronen; Bunn, Paul A; Peled, Nir.
Afiliação
  • Pekar-Zlotin M; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Hirsch FR; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Soussan-Gutman L; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Ilouze M; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Dvir A; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Boyle T; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Wynes M; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Miller VA; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Lipson D; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Palmer GA; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Ali SM; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Dekel S; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Brenner R; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Bunn PA; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
  • Peled N; Thoracic Cancer Research and Detection Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Oncotest, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva
Oncologist ; 20(3): 316-22, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25721120
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved method for detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); however, data supporting the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for that purpose are accumulating. Previous studies that compared FISH and IHC considered FISH the gold standard, but none compared data with the results of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We studied FISH and IHC (D5F3 antibody) systematically for EML4-ALK rearrangement in 51 lung adenocarcinoma patients, followed by NGS in case of discordance.

RESULTS:

Of 51 patients, 4 were positive with FISH (7.8%), and 8 were positive with IHC (15.7%). Three were positive with both. NGS confirmed that four of the five patients who were positive with IHC and negative with FISH were positive for ALK. Two were treated by crizotinib, with progression-free survival of 18 and 6 months. Considering NGS as the most accurate test, the sensitivity and specificity were 42.9% and 97.7%, respectively, for FISH and 100% and 97.7%, respectively, for IHC.

CONCLUSION:

The FISH-based method of detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer may miss a significant number of patients who could benefit from targeted ALK therapy. Screening for EML4-ALK rearrangement by IHC should be strongly considered, and NGS is recommended in borderline cases. Two patients who were negative with FISH and positive with IHC were treated with crizotinib and responded to therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rearranjo Gênico / Adenocarcinoma / Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica / Programas de Rastreamento / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rearranjo Gênico / Adenocarcinoma / Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica / Programas de Rastreamento / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article