Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Politano-Leadbetter versus Cohen technique.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of the Politano-Leadbetter and Cohen techniques in laparoscopic pneumovesicum approach for ureteral reimplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 24 patients who underwent transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation during the period from 2007 to 2014. The patients were treated with either the Cohen or Politano-Leadbetter technique. Operative duration, duration of hospital stay, and success and complication rates were compared. RESULTS: Operative duration was 1 h longer for the Politano-Leadbetter technique than for the Cohen technique (P < 0.05). Foley catheters were removed 2-3 days after the procedures. The mean hospital stay was 3.6 days. Reflux completely resolved in 21 patients (35 ureters, 94.6%), but not in two patients (2 ureters). There was no difference in the success rate or durations of catheterization or hospital stay between patients treated with the Politano-Leadbetter technique and those treated with the Cohen technique. CONCLUSIONS: The Politano-Leadbetter and Cohen techniques are both reliable for transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation. Despite a longer operative time, because of the higher surgical complexity, the Politano-Leadbetter ureteral reimplantation offers important physiological advantages over other techniques.