Assessment of a standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncopes.
Eur Heart J
; 36(24): 1529-35, 2015 Jun 21.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-25825044
ABSTRACT
AIMS:
Opinions differ regarding the effectiveness of cardiac pacing in patients affected by reflex syncope. We assessed a standardized guideline-based algorithm in different forms of reflex syncope. METHODS ANDRESULTS:
In this prospective, multi-centre, observational study, patients aged >40 years, affected by severe unpredictable recurrent reflex syncopes, underwent carotid sinus massage (CSM), followed by tilt testing (TT) if CSM was negative, followed by implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) if TT was negative. Those who had an asystolic response to one of these tests received a dual-chamber pacemaker. POPULATION 253 patients, mean age 70 ± 12 years, median 4 (3-6) syncopes, 89% without or with short prodromes. Of these patients, 120 (47%) received a pacemaker and 106 were followed up for a mean of 13 ± 7 months syncope recurred in 10 (9%). The recurrence rate was similar in 61 CSM+ (11%), 30 TT+ (7%), and 15 ILR+ (7%) patients. The actuarial total syncope recurrence rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 6-12) at 1 year and 15% (95% CI, 10-20) at 2 years and was significantly lower than that observed in the group of 124 patients with non-diagnostic tests who had received an ILR i.e. 22% (95% CI, 18-26) at 1 year and 37% (95% CI, 30-43) at 2 years (P = 0.004).CONCLUSION:
About half of older patients with severe recurrent syncopes without prodromes have an asystolic reflex for which cardiac pacing goes along with a low recurrence rate. The study supports the clinical utility of the algorithm for the selection of candidates to cardiac pacing in everyday clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION http//www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT01509534.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Síncope
/
Algoritmos
/
Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Etiology_studies
/
Guideline
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Limite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2015
Tipo de documento:
Article