Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in postoperative pain management.
Sinatra, Raymond S; Viscusi, Eugene R; Ding, Li; Danesi, Hassan; Jones, James B; Grond, Stefan.
Afiliação
  • Sinatra RS; West Haven VA Medical Center , West Haven, CT , USA.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 16(11): 1607-13, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26050870
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This meta-analysis was conducted to analyze and compare the efficacy outcomes associated with the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and morphine intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the management of postoperative pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS:

This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of the fentanyl ITS versus morphine IV PCA using data from four randomized, active-controlled trials (n = 1271 fentanyl ITS and 1298 morphine IV PCA patients). Main outcome measures were patient global assessment (PGA) of the method of pain control at 24 h.

RESULTS:

Fentanyl ITS and morphine IV PCA did not significantly differ regarding 'good' and 'excellent' ratings on the PGA of the method of pain control at 24 h (odds ratio = 0.95, p = 0.66), however, fentanyl ITS was superior in terms of 'excellent' PGA ratings at that time point (odds ratio = 1.53, p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in weighted mean pain intensity scores at 24, 48 and 72 h.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this meta-analysis, fentanyl ITS was as efficacious as morphine IV PCA and may offer additional benefits as demonstrated by its 'excellent' PGA ratings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Fentanila / Analgésicos Opioides Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Fentanila / Analgésicos Opioides Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article