Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Hematologic Safety of Same Day Versus Standard Administration (24- to 72-Hour Delay) of Pegfilgrastim in Gynecology Oncology Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.
Billingsley, Caroline C; Jacobson, Samuel N; Crafton, Sarah M; Crim, Aleia K; Li, Quan; Hade, Erinn M; Cohn, David E; Fowler, Jeffrey M; Copeland, Larry J; Salani, Ritu; Backes, Floor J; O'Malley, David M.
Afiliação
  • Billingsley CC; *Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, †Department of Pharmacy, Richard J. Solove Research Institute, ‡Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, and §Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 25(7): 1331-6, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26067861
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We assessed the safety and efficacy of administration of pegfilgrastim on the same day compared with standard administration 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS:

A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing pegfilgrastim to mitigate the myelosuppressive consequences of chemotherapy. The primary outcome was incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia following pegfilgrastim for same-day administration (D1) versus standard administration (D2+). Secondary outcomes included dose delay, regimen change, hospitalization due to neutropenia, and incidence of febrile neutropenia.

RESULTS:

Four hundred twenty-one patients with 2071 administrations of pegfilgrastim were included. Five hundred six administrations of pegfilgrastim were given on D1 compared with 1565 administrations on D2+. The most common malignancy was ovarian cancer (79.1%), followed by endometrial (14.5%). Comparing the D1 and D2+ cohorts, noninferiority was not established for the incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (2.6% vs 1.8%, adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.6; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-3.2) or dose modification (6.5% vs 4.9%; aRR, 1.3; 90% CI, 0.9-1.8). However, the rate of treatment delays (7.3% vs 9.4%; aRR, 0.8; 90% CI, 0.6-1.1) in the D1 and D2+ groups suggested that delays in the D1 group were not more common than in the D2+ group.

CONCLUSIONS:

The incidence of hematologic toxicities and dose modification in patients receiving same-day pegfilgrastim were not as low as in those undergoing standard administration. However, treatment delays were found to be no more frequent in those receiving same-day pegfilgrastim versus standard administration. Same-day administration of pegfilgrastim is a reasonable option.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos / Neutropenia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos / Neutropenia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article