Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
Belderbos, Tim D G; Grobbee, Elisabeth J; van Oijen, Martijn G H; Meijssen, Maarten A C; Ouwendijk, Rob J T; Tang, Thjon J; ter Borg, Frank; van der Schaar, Peter; Le Fèvre, Doris M; Stouten, Merijn T; van der Galiën, Onno; Hiemstra, Theo J; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Wouter H; ter Borg, Pieter C J; Spaander, Manon C W; Moons, Leon M G; Kuipers, Ernst J; Siersema, Peter D.
Afiliação
  • Belderbos TD; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Grobbee EJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Oijen MG; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Meijssen MA; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Ouwendijk RJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Tang TJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands.
  • ter Borg F; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
  • van der Schaar P; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Le Fèvre DM; Achmea Health Care, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Stouten MT; Gupta Strategists, Ophemert, The Netherlands.
  • van der Galiën O; Achmea Health Care, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Hiemstra TJ; Achmea Health Care, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • ter Borg PC; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Spaander MC; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Moons LM; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Kuipers EJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Siersema PD; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Endoscopy ; 47(8): 703-9, 2015 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26090725
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Cecal intubation rate (CIR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) have been found to be inversely associated with the occurrence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Depicting differences in CIR and ADR between hospitals could provide incentives for quality improvement. The aim of this study was to compare quality parameters of routine colonoscopies between seven hospitals in The Netherlands in order to determine the extent to which possible differences were attributable to procedural and institutional factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were prospectively included between November 2012 and January 2013 at two academic and five nonacademic hospitals. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes were excluded. Main outcome measures were CIR and ADR. RESULTS: A total of 3129 patients were included (mean age 59 ±â€Š15 years; 45.5 % male). The majority of patients (86.2 %) had a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score ≥ 6. Overall CIR was 94.8 %, ranging from 89.4 % to 99.2 % between hospitals. After adjustment for case mix (age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and indication for colonoscopy), factors associated with CIR were hospital and a BBPS score ≥ 6. Overall ADR was 31.8 % and varied between hospitals, ranging from 24.8 % to 46.8 %. Independent predictors for ADR were hospital, BBPS score ≥ 6, and cecal intubation. By combining CIR and ADR for each hospital, a colonoscopy quality indicator (CQI) was developed, which can be used by hospitals to stimulate quality improvement. CONCLUSION: Differences in the quality of colonoscopy between hospitals can be demonstrated using CIR and ADR. As both indicators are affected by institution and bowel preparation, a comparison between hospitals based on the newly developed CQI could assist in further improving the quality of colonoscopy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Adenoma / Ceco / Programas de Rastreamento / Colonoscopia / Competência Clínica / Melhoria de Qualidade / Hospitais / Intubação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Adenoma / Ceco / Programas de Rastreamento / Colonoscopia / Competência Clínica / Melhoria de Qualidade / Hospitais / Intubação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article