Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combined MRI and MRS improves pre-therapeutic diagnoses of pediatric brain tumors over MRI alone.
Shiroishi, Mark S; Panigrahy, Ashok; Moore, Kevin R; Nelson, Marvin D; Gilles, Floyd H; Gonzalez-Gomez, Ignacio; Blüml, Stefan.
Afiliação
  • Shiroishi MS; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Keck School of Medicine of USC, MS 81, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
  • Panigrahy A; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Keck School of Medicine of USC, MS 81, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
  • Moore KR; Department of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Nelson MD; Department of Radiology, Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Gilles FH; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Keck School of Medicine of USC, MS 81, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
  • Gonzalez-Gomez I; Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Blüml S; Department of Pathology, All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Neuroradiology ; 57(9): 951-6, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26141852
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The specific goal of this study was to determine whether the inclusion of MRS had a measureable and positive impact on the accuracy of pre-surgical MR examinations of untreated pediatric brain tumors over that of MRI alone in clinical practice.

METHODS:

Final imaging reports of 120 pediatric patients with newly detected brain tumors who underwent combined MRI/MRS examinations were retrospectively reviewed. Final pathology was available in all cases. Group A comprised 60 subjects studied between June 2001 and January 2005, when MRS was considered exploratory and radiologists utilized only conventional MRI to arrive at a diagnosis. For group B, comprising 60 subjects studied between January 2005 and March 2008, the radiologists utilized information from both MRI and MRS. Furthermore, radiologists revisited group A (blind review, time lapse >4 years) to determine whether the additional information from MRS would have altered their interpretation.

RESULTS:

Sixty-three percent of patients in group A were diagnosed correctly, whereas in 10% the report was partially correct with the final tumor type mentioned (but not mentioned as most likely tumor), while in 27% of cases the reports were wrong. For group B, the diagnoses were correct in 87%, partially correct in 5%, and incorrect in 8% of the cases, which is a significant improvement (p < 0.005). Re-review of combined MRI and MRS of group A resulted 87% correct, 7% partially correct, and 7% incorrect diagnoses, which is a significant improvement over the original diagnoses (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Adding MRS to conventional MRI significantly improved diagnostic accuracy in preoperative pediatric patients with untreated brain tumors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética / Imagem Multimodal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética / Imagem Multimodal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article