Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach.
Puszka, Stefanie; Nagel, Tricia; Matthews, Veronica; Mosca, Diana; Piovesan, Rebecca; Nori, Annapurna; Bailie, Ross.
Afiliação
  • Puszka S; Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia.
  • Nagel T; Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia.
  • Matthews V; Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia.
  • Mosca D; Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia ; One21seventy, The National Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care, PO Box 10639, Adelaide Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.
  • Piovesan R; Watto Purrunna Aboriginal Health Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, 1 Gilles Crescent, Hillcrest, SA 5086 Australia.
  • Nori A; Watto Purrunna Aboriginal Health Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, 1 Gilles Crescent, Hillcrest, SA 5086 Australia.
  • Bailie R; Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810 Australia ; One21seventy, The National Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care, PO Box 10639, Adelaide Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26170899
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The mental health needs of young people are often inadequately met by health services. Quality improvement approaches provide a framework for measuring, assessing and improving the quality of healthcare. However, a lack of performance standards and measurement tools are an impediment to their implementation. This paper reports on the initial stages of development of a clinical audit tool for assessing the quality of primary healthcare for Australian Indigenous youth aged 12-24 including mental health services provided within primary care.

METHODS:

Audit items were determined through review of relevant guidelines, expert reference group consensus opinion and specific inclusion criteria. Pilot testing was undertaken at four Indigenous primary healthcare services. A focus group discussion involving five staff from a health service participating in pilot testing explored user experiences of the tool.

RESULTS:

Audit items comprise key measures of processes and outcomes of care for Indigenous youth, as determined by the expert reference group. Gaps and conflicts in relevant guidelines and a lack of agreed performance indicators necessitated a tool development process that relied heavily on expert reference group advice and audit item inclusion criteria. Pilot testing and user feedback highlighted the importance of feasibility and context-specific considerations in tool development and design.

CONCLUSIONS:

The youth health audit tool provides a first step in monitoring, assessing and improving the way Indigenous primary healthcare services engage with and respond to the needs of youth. Our approach offers a way forward for further development of quality measures in the absence of clearly articulated standards of care.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article