Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Targeted individual prophylaxis offers superior risk stratification for cytomegalovirus reactivation after liver transplantation.
Sood, Siddharth; Haifer, Craig; Yu, Lijia; Pavlovic, Julie; Gow, Paul J; Jones, Robert M; Visvanathan, Kumar; Angus, Peter W; Testro, Adam G.
Afiliação
  • Sood S; Liver Transplant Unit Victoria, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Haifer C; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Yu L; Innate Immune Laboratory, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Pavlovic J; Liver Transplant Unit Victoria, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Gow PJ; Innate Immune Laboratory, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Jones RM; Liver Transplant Unit Victoria, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Visvanathan K; Liver Transplant Unit Victoria, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Angus PW; Liver Transplant Unit Victoria, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Testro AG; Innate Immune Laboratory, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Liver Transpl ; 21(12): 1478-85, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26194446
ABSTRACT
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can reactivate following liver transplantation. Management of patients currently considered low risk based on pretransplant serology remains contentious, with universal prophylaxis and preemptive strategies suffering from significant deficiencies. We hypothesized that a CMV-specific T cell assay performed early after transplant as part of a preemptive strategy could better stratify "low-risk" (recipient seropositive) patients. We conducted a prospective, blinded, observational study in 75 adult recipients. QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus was performed both before and at multiple times after transplant. Low-risk patients (n = 58) were monitored as per unit protocol and treatment was commenced if CMV > 1000 copies/mL (DNAemia). Twenty patients needed antiviral treatment for other reasons and were censored (mainly for rejection or herpes simplex virus infection); 19/38 (50%) of the remaining low-risk patients developed DNAemia at mean 34.6 days after transplant. A week 2 result of <0.1 IU/mL was significantly associated with risk of subsequent DNAemia (hazard ratio [HR], 6.9; P = 0.002). The positive predictive value of 80% suggests these patients are inappropriately labeled low risk and are actually at high likelihood of CMV reactivation. A secondary cutoff of <0.2 IU/mL was associated with moderate risk (HR, 2.8; P = 0.01). In conclusion, a protocol based on a single early CMV-specific T cell based assay would offer improved risk stratification and individualization of patient management after transplant. This could offer improved drug and service utilization and potentially result in significant improvements over both currently used protocols to manage supposedly low-risk patients.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Transplante de Fígado / Infecções por Citomegalovirus Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Transplante de Fígado / Infecções por Citomegalovirus Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article