Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.
Douglas, Pamela S; Pontone, Gianluca; Hlatky, Mark A; Patel, Manesh R; Norgaard, Bjarne L; Byrne, Robert A; Curzen, Nick; Purcell, Ian; Gutberlet, Matthias; Rioufol, Gilles; Hink, Ulrich; Schuchlenz, Herwig Walter; Feuchtner, Gudrun; Gilard, Martine; Andreini, Daniele; Jensen, Jesper M; Hadamitzky, Martin; Chiswell, Karen; Cyr, Derek; Wilk, Alan; Wang, Furong; Rogers, Campbell; De Bruyne, Bernard.
Afiliação
  • Douglas PS; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 7022 North Pavilion DUMC, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, USA pamela.douglas@duke.edu.
  • Pontone G; Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Hlatky MA; Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Patel MR; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 7022 North Pavilion DUMC, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, USA.
  • Norgaard BL; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus Skejby, Denmark.
  • Byrne RA; Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Curzen N; University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Purcell I; Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Gutberlet M; University of Leipzig Heart Centre, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Rioufol G; Hospices Civils de Lyon and CARMEN INSERM 1060, Lyon, France.
  • Hink U; Department of Cardiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
  • Schuchlenz HW; LKH Graz West, Graz, Austria.
  • Feuchtner G; Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Gilard M; Department of Cardiology, Cavale Blanche Hospital, Brest, France.
  • Andreini D; Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Jensen JM; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus Skejby, Denmark.
  • Hadamitzky M; Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Chiswell K; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 7022 North Pavilion DUMC, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, USA.
  • Cyr D; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 7022 North Pavilion DUMC, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, USA.
  • Wilk A; HeartFlow, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  • Wang F; HeartFlow, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  • Rogers C; HeartFlow, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  • De Bruyne B; Cardiovascular Centre Aalst, Aalst, Belgium.
Eur Heart J ; 36(47): 3359-67, 2015 Dec 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26330417
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

In symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), computed tomographic angiography (CTA) improves patient selection for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) compared with functional testing. The impact of measuring fractional flow reserve by CTA (FFRCT) is unknown. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

At 11 sites, 584 patients with new onset chest pain were prospectively assigned to receive either usual testing (n = 287) or CTA/FFR(CT) (n = 297). Test interpretation and care decisions were made by the clinical care team. The primary endpoint was the percentage of those with planned ICA in whom no significant obstructive CAD (no stenosis ≥50% by core laboratory quantitative analysis or invasive FFR < 0.80) was found at ICA within 90 days. Secondary endpoints including death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization were independently and blindly adjudicated. Subjects averaged 61 ± 11 years of age, 40% were female, and the mean pre-test probability of obstructive CAD was 49 ± 17%. Among those with intended ICA (FFR(CT)-guided = 193; usual care = 187), no obstructive CAD was found at ICA in 24 (12%) in the CTA/FFR(CT) arm and 137 (73%) in the usual care arm (risk difference 61%, 95% confidence interval 53-69, P< 0.0001), with similar mean cumulative radiation exposure (9.9 vs. 9.4 mSv, P = 0.20). Invasive coronary angiography was cancelled in 61% after receiving CTA/FFR(CT) results. Among those with intended non-invasive testing, the rates of finding no obstructive CAD at ICA were 13% (CTA/FFR(CT)) and 6% (usual care; P = 0.95). Clinical event rates within 90 days were low in usual care and CTA/FFR(CT) arms.

CONCLUSIONS:

Computed tomographic angiography/fractional flow reserve by CTA was a feasible and safe alternative to ICA and was associated with a significantly lower rate of invasive angiography showing no obstructive CAD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article