Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consensus on biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumour disease.
Oberg, Kjell; Modlin, Irvin M; De Herder, Wouter; Pavel, Marianne; Klimstra, David; Frilling, Andrea; Metz, David C; Heaney, Anthony; Kwekkeboom, Dik; Strosberg, Jonathan; Meyer, Timothy; Moss, Steven F; Washington, Kay; Wolin, Edward; Liu, Eric; Goldenring, James.
Afiliação
  • Oberg K; Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Modlin IM; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA. Electronic address: imodlin@optonline.net.
  • De Herder W; Section of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Pavel M; Charite Universitätsmedzin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Klimstra D; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Frilling A; Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
  • Metz DC; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Heaney A; Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Kwekkeboom D; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Strosberg J; H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Meyer T; University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
  • Moss SF; Brown University, Liver Research Center, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Washington K; Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Wolin E; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
  • Liu E; Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Goldenring J; Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lancet Oncol ; 16(9): e435-e446, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26370353
ABSTRACT
Management of neuroendocrine neoplasia represents a clinical challenge because of its late presentation, lack of treatment options, and limitations in present imaging modalities and biomarkers to guide management. Monoanalyte biomarkers have poor sensitivity, specificity, and predictive ability. A National Cancer Institute summit, held in 2007, on neuroendocrine tumours noted biomarker limitations to be a crucial unmet need in the management of neuroendocrine tumours. A multinational consensus meeting of multidisciplinary experts in neuroendocrine tumours assessed the use of current biomarkers and defined the perquisites for novel biomarkers via the Delphi method. Consensus (at >75%) was achieved for 88 (82%) of 107 assessment questions. The panel concluded that circulating multianalyte biomarkers provide the highest sensitivity and specificity necessary for minimum disease detection and that this type of biomarker had sufficient information to predict treatment effectiveness and prognosis. The panel also concluded that no monoanalyte biomarker of neuroendocrine tumours has yet fulfilled these criteria and there is insufficient information to support the clinical use of miRNA or circulating tumour cells as useful prognostic markers for this disease. The panel considered that trials measuring multianalytes (eg, neuroendocrine gene transcripts) should also identify how such information can optimise the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Tumores Neuroendócrinos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Tumores Neuroendócrinos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article