Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perforated peptic ulcer.
Søreide, Kjetil; Thorsen, Kenneth; Harrison, Ewen M; Bingener, Juliane; Møller, Morten H; Ohene-Yeboah, Michael; Søreide, Jon Arne.
Afiliação
  • Søreide K; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: ksoreide@mac.com.
  • Thorsen K; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Harrison EM; MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Bingener J; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Møller MH; Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Ohene-Yeboah M; Department of Surgery, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
  • Søreide JA; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Lancet ; 386(10000): 1288-1298, 2015 Sep 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26460663
ABSTRACT
Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera Péptica Perfurada Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera Péptica Perfurada Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article