Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bayesian modeling of virus removal efficiency in wastewater treatment processes.
Ito, T; Kato, T; Takagishi, K; Okabe, S; Sano, D.
Afiliação
  • Ito T; Division of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8628, Japan E-mail: dsano@eng.hokudai.ac.jp.
  • Kato T; Department of Computer Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Gunma University, Tenjinmachi 1-5-1, Kiryu, Gunma, 376-8515, Japan.
  • Takagishi K; Division of Electronics and Informatics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Gunma University, Tenjinmachi 1-5-1, Kiryu, Gunma, 376-8515, Japan.
  • Okabe S; Division of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8628, Japan E-mail: dsano@eng.hokudai.ac.jp.
  • Sano D; Division of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8628, Japan E-mail: dsano@eng.hokudai.ac.jp.
Water Sci Technol ; 72(10): 1789-95, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26540540
ABSTRACT
Left-censored datasets of virus density in wastewater samples make it difficult to evaluate the virus removal efficiency in wastewater treatment processes. In the present study, we modeled the probabilistic distribution of virus removal efficiency in a wastewater treatment process with a Bayesian approach, and investigated how many detect samples in influent and effluent are necessary for accurate estimation. One hundred left-censored data of virus density in wastewater (influent and effluent) were artificially generated based on assumed log-normal distributions and the posterior predictive distribution of virus density, and the log-ratio distribution were estimated. The estimation accuracy of distributions was quantified by Bhattacharyya coefficient. When it is assumed that the accurate estimation of posterior predictive distributions is possible when a 100% positive rate is obtained for 12 pairs of influent and effluent, 11 out of 144, 60 out of 324, and 201 out of 576 combinations of detect samples gave an accurate estimation at the significant level of 0.01 in a Kruskal-Wallis test when the total sample number was 12, 18, and 24, respectively. The combinations with the minimum number of detect samples were (12, 9), (16, 10), and (21, 8) when the total sample number was 12, 18, and 24, respectively.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos / Teorema de Bayes / Águas Residuárias / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos / Teorema de Bayes / Águas Residuárias / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article