Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.
Schellart, René P; Oude Rengerink, Katrien; Van der Aa, Frank; Lucot, Jean-Philippe; Kimpe, Bart; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G W; Roovers, Jan-Paul W R.
Afiliação
  • Schellart RP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Boerhaavelaan 22, 2035 RC, Haarlem, The Netherlands. schell@kg.nl.
  • Oude Rengerink K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Van der Aa F; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Lucot JP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeanne de Flandre Hôpital, Lille Cedex, France.
  • Kimpe B; Department of Urology, General Hospital Sint Lucas, Bruges, Belgium.
  • Dijkgraaf MG; Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Roovers JP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int Urogynecol J ; 27(6): 871-7, 2016 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670576
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

HYPOTHESIS:

Midurethral sling procedures have become the principal surgical treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The 1-year results of this international trial comparing the efficacy and morbidity of a single-incision midurethral sling (SIMS; MiniArc) and a transobturator standard midurethral sling (SMUS; Monarc) showed that MiniArc is non-inferior regarding subjective cure and superior with regard to postoperative pain and recovery. The objective was to compare subjective and objective cure, morbidity and surgery-related discomfort following SIMS and transobturator SMUS up to a 24-month follow-up.

METHODS:

We carried out a non-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. Women with symptomatic SUI were eligible. Primary outcome was subjective cure, defined as an improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), at 12, 24 and 36 months. Secondary outcomes were objective cure based on the cough stress test, disease-specific quality of life questionnaires, surgical parameters and physical performance during recovery. Analysis was by intent to treat. Differences between the two groups regarding dichotomous variables were Chi-squared tested and presented as relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals.

RESULTS:

We randomised 97 women to MiniArc and 96 to Monarc. At the 24-month follow-up, subjective cure was 84 % following MiniArc and 89 % following Monarc (RR -5; 95% CI -0.17 to 0.06). Objective cure was 93 % following MiniArc and 94 % following Monarc (RR -1; 95% CI -0.10 to 0.07). Both procedures have low complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS:

At the 2-year follow-up, the non-prespecified analysis of this randomised trial showed that the MiniArc, a single-incision sling, had similar subjective and similar objective cure rates, although non-inferiority to Monarc for subjective cure could not be demonstrated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia / Incontinência Urinária por Estresse / Slings Suburetrais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia / Incontinência Urinária por Estresse / Slings Suburetrais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article