Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of bioimpedance spectroscopy and the Watson formula for measuring body volume in patients on peritoneal dialysis.
Martínez Fernández, Gonzalo; Ortega Cerrato, Agustín; de la Vara Iniesta, Lourdes; Oliver Galera, Eva; Gómez Roldán, Carmen; Pérez Martínez, Juan.
Afiliação
  • Martínez Fernández G; Servicio de Nefrología, Complejo Hospitalario y Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, España.
  • Ortega Cerrato A; Servicio de Nefrología, Complejo Hospitalario y Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, España.
  • de la Vara Iniesta L; Servicio de Nefrología, Complejo Hospitalario y Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, España.
  • Oliver Galera E; Servicio de Medicina Interna, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Galera (Albacete), España.
  • Gómez Roldán C; Servicio de Nefrología, Complejo Hospitalario y Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, España.
  • Pérez Martínez J; Servicio de Nefrología, Complejo Hospitalario y Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, España. Electronic address: gonzalomfer@hotmail.com.
Nefrologia ; 36(1): 57-62, 2016.
Article em En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26708614
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Knowing total body volume (V) is crucial in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). It is usually calculated by the Watson anthropometric formula, although the use of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is becoming increasingly widespread. Measuring V with both methods can at times produce quite different results.

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to identify differences between the 2 forms of measuring volume in a PD unit and determine which clinical factors are associated with these differences.

METHODS:

Ours is an observational study of 74 patients on PD. We measured V using BIS (Vbis) and the Watson formula (Vw); 271 measurements were made with each method. We calculated the difference between Vbis and Vw in each patient and classified them into 2 groups Difference between volumes ≥10% or <10% Vbis. We assessed the presence of several clinical parameters in our patients. We assessed whether there were any differences between Vbis and Vw (Student t-test). We determined whether there was any association between the difference in volumes and the presence of the clinical parameters analysed (chi square test).

RESULTS:

V was 2.15 l higher measured by the Watson formula than with BIS (P<.01). In 58.67% of the measurements, the difference between Vbis and Vw was ≥10%. Significant differences were found when comparing the presence of difference between volumes and the presence or not of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p=0,03), hypertension (HTN) (p=0,036), hypoalbuminemia (p<0,01), hypoprealbuminemia (p<0,01), low phase angle at 50 Hz (p<0,01), high C reactive protein (p<0,01), obesity (p=0,027), E/I ratio (ratio between extracellular and intracellular water) ≥1 (p<0.01) and residual diuresis (p=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS:

There are significant differences in the V of PD Unit patients when obtained by Watson formula or by BIS. A difference between the measurements is associated with the presence of DM, HTN, hypoalbuminaemia, obesity, malnutrition, inflammation, E/I ratio ≥1 and the absence of residual diuresis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Composição Corporal / Diálise Peritoneal / Impedância Elétrica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Composição Corporal / Diálise Peritoneal / Impedância Elétrica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article