Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Skin Penetration of Diclofenac from a Novel Topical Non Aqueous Solution: A Comparative Bioavailability Study.
Nivsarkar, Manish; Maroo, Sanjaykumar H; Patel, Ketan R; Patel, Dixit D.
Afiliação
  • Nivsarkar M; Director, B. V. Patel Pharmaceutical Education and Research Development (PERD) Centre , Sarkhej-Gandhinagar Highway, Ahmedabad-Gujarat, India .
  • Maroo SH; Senior G.M., Medical Services Department, Troikaa pharmaceuticals Ltd , Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India .
  • Patel KR; M. Pharm (Pharmaceutical Chemistry), Research and Development, Chairman and Managing Director, Troikaa pharmaceuticals Ltd , Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India .
  • Patel DD; M. Pharm, Executive, Medical Services Department, Troikaa pharmaceuticals Ltd , Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India .
J Clin Diagn Res ; 9(12): FC11-3, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26816910
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Different topical formulations of diclofenac have varying skin penetration profile. Recent advances in science and technology has led to the development of many new formulations of drugs for topical drug delivery. One such technological development has led to the innovation of Dynapar QPS, a novel, non-aqueous, quick penetrating solution (QPS) of diclofenac diethylamine.

AIM:

This study was aimed to measure the total exposure from the drug penetrating the skin in healthy human subjects and comparing the relative systemic bioavailability of Dynapar QPS(®) with diclofenac emulgel. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A 200 mg of diclofenac from either Dynapar QPS(®) (5 ml) or emulgel (20 g) was applied on back of subject as per the randomisation schedule. Blood samples were collected up to 16 hours post drug application. Plasma concentration of diclofenac was measured by pre-validated HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters like Cmax, Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Kel, of diclofenac were determined for both the formulations.

RESULTS:

Mean Cmax after administration of Dynapar QPS(®) and diclofenac emulgel were 175.93 and 40.04 ng/ml, respectively. Tmax of diclofenac was almost half with QPS compared to emulgel (5.24 hrs versus 9.53 hrs respectively). The mean AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ after administration of Dynapar QPS(®) was higher as compared to diclofenac emulgel (AUC0-t 1224.19 versus 289.78 ng.h/ml, respectively; AUC0-∞ 1718.21 versus 513.83 ng.h/ml, respectively). None of the subject experienced any adverse event during the study.

CONCLUSION:

The results indicate an enhanced penetration and subsequent absorption of diclofenac from Dynapar QPS(®) as compared to diclofenac emulgel. Higher penetration is likely to translate into better pain relief in patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article