Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A micro-computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for filling material removal in root canal retreatment.
Monguilhott Crozeta, Bruno; Damião de Sousa-Neto, Manoel; Bianchi Leoni, Graziela; Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Jardel; Terezinha Corrêa Silva-Sousa, Yara; Baratto-Filho, Flares.
Afiliação
  • Monguilhott Crozeta B; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Damião de Sousa-Neto M; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. sousanet@forp.usp.br.
  • Bianchi Leoni G; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Francisco Mazzi-Chaves J; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Terezinha Corrêa Silva-Sousa Y; Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
  • Baratto-Filho F; Department of Dentistry, Positivo University, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig ; 20(8): 2235-2240, 2016 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26820291
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for removing filling material from root canals, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distal root canals of 42 human mandibular molars were instrumented with hand files up to size 40 according to a step-down technique and obturated with gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer using Tagger's hybrid technique. Teeth were divided into six groups (n = 7) according to the instruments used for removal of filling material: group PTUR (Protaper Universal Retreatment), group W40 (WaveOne 40.08), group R40 (Reciproc 40.06), group R50 (Reciproc 50.05), group W25/W40 (WaveOne 25.08/40.08), and group R25/R40/R50 (Reciproc 25.08/40.06/50.05). Teeth were scanned with a micro-CT device before and after use of the instruments to calculate the percentage of remaining filling material. Data were compared using one-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD test at 5 % significance level. RESULTS: The mean percentage of remaining filling material was significantly lower when canals were retreated with the set of instruments R25/R40/R50 and single instruments W40 and R50 compared with the set of instruments W25/W40 (P < 0.05), which promoted material compaction in the apical region. CONCLUSION: None of the retreatment techniques removed the root fillings completely. PTUR instruments performed equally effective regarding filling removal compared with W40, R40, R50, W25/W40, and R25/R40/R50. For WaveOne, the use of a single instrument (size 40, taper 0.08) was more effective in removing filling material, while for Reciproc showed similar cleaning ability using single instrument or combination of instruments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this in vitro study provide consistent information on filling material removal capacity of mechanized systems during retreatment at the different root canal thirds.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Obturação do Canal Radicular / Microtomografia por Raio-X / Dente Molar Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Obturação do Canal Radicular / Microtomografia por Raio-X / Dente Molar Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article