Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methotrexate intolerance in oral and subcutaneous administration in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a cross-sectional, observational study.
van Dijkhuizen, E H Pieter; Pouw, Juliëtte N; Scheuern, Andrea; Hügle, Boris; Hardt, Sven; Ganser, Gerd; Kümmerle-Deschner, Jasmin Beate; Horneff, Gerd; Holzinger, Dirk; Bulatovic Calasan, Maja; Wulffraat, Nico M.
Afiliação
  • van Dijkhuizen EH; University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; and IRCCS G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy. e.h.p.dijkhuizen@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Pouw JN; University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Scheuern A; German Center for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • Hügle B; German Center for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • Hardt S; St. Josef-Stift, Sendenhorst, Germany.
  • Ganser G; St. Josef-Stift, Sendenhorst, Germany.
  • Kümmerle-Deschner JB; University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.
  • Horneff G; Asklepios Klinik Sankt Augustin, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
  • Holzinger D; University Children's Hospital Münster, Germany.
  • Bulatovic Calasan M; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Wulffraat NM; University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 34(1): 148-54, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26843067
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In Dutch patients, MTX intolerance occurred frequently and was associated with subcutaneous (SC) administration. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of MTX intolerance and its association with the route of administration in a German cohort of JIA patients.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study of JIA patients on MTX was performed. Primary outcome was MTX intolerance, which was determined using the validated Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS) questionnaire. The prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse effects and MTX intolerance was compared between patients on MTX SC and MTX administered orally (PO).

RESULTS:

Of 179 JIA patients on MTX, 73 (40.8%) were intolerant. The odds of MTX intolerance were higher in patients using MTX exclusively SC compared to exclusively PO (adjusted odds ratio 3.37 [95% confidence interval 1.19-10.0]). There was strong evidence that the former experienced more behavioural complaints (76.1% vs. 47.4%, p=0.001) and weak evidence that they experienced more abdominal pain after MTX intake (43.5% vs. 27.4%, p=0.056).

CONCLUSIONS:

The prevalence of MTX intolerance was high and exclusively SC administration of MTX was associated with MTX intolerance and behavioural adverse effects. The prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse effects was at least as high as in patients on MTX PO. The frequently held assumption that SC causes fewer side effects than PO seems unwarranted. Definite answers about the differences between SC and PO administration with respect to safety and efficacy should be obtained by randomised trials.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Juvenil / Metotrexato / Imunossupressores Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Juvenil / Metotrexato / Imunossupressores Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article