Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative assessment of onabotulinumtoxinA and mirabegron for overactive bladder: an indirect treatment comparison.
Freemantle, Nick; Ginsberg, David A; McCool, Rachael; Fleetwood, Kelly; Arber, Mick; Khalaf, Kristin; Loveman, Clara; Ni, Quanhong; Glanville, Julie.
Afiliação
  • Freemantle N; Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Ginsberg DA; USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • McCool R; York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
  • Fleetwood K; Quantics, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Arber M; York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
  • Khalaf K; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California, USA Xcenda, Palm Harbor, Florida, USA.
  • Loveman C; Allergan Holdings Ltd, Marlow, UK.
  • Ni Q; Allergan, Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA Celgene, Summit, New Jersey, USA.
  • Glanville J; York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
BMJ Open ; 6(2): e009122, 2016 Feb 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908514
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT OnabotulinumtoxinA and mirabegron have recently gained marketing authorisation to treat symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB).

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the relative efficacy of mirabegron and onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with idiopathic OAB.

DESIGN:

Network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES A search of 9 electronic databases, review documents, guidelines and websites.

METHODS:

Randomised trials comparing any licensed dose of onabotulinumtoxinA or mirabegron with each other, anticholinergic drugs or placebo were eligible (19 randomised trials were identified). 1 reviewer extracted data from the studies and a second reviewer checked the data. Candidate trials were assessed for similarity and networks were developed for each outcome. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using both fixed-effects and random-effects models. When there were differences in mean baseline values between mirabegron and onabotulinumtoxinA trials they were adjusted for using network meta-regression (NMR).

RESULTS:

No studies directly comparing onabotulinumtoxinA to mirabegron were identified. A network was created for each of the 7 outcomes, with 3-9 studies included in each individual network. The trials included in the networks were broadly similar. Patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA trials had more urinary incontinence and urgency episodes at baseline than patients in the mirabegron trials and these differences were adjusted for using NMR. Both onabotulinumtoxinA and mirabegron were more efficacious than placebo at reducing the frequency of urinary incontinence, urgency, urination and nocturia. OnabotulinumtoxinA was more efficacious than mirabegron (50 and 25 mg) in completely resolving daily episodes of urinary incontinence and urgency and in reducing the frequency of urinary incontinence, urgency and urination. NMR supported the results of the network meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the absence of head-to-head trials comparing onabotulinumtoxinA to mirabegron, this indirect comparison indicates that onabotulinumtoxinA may be superior to mirabegron in improving symptoms of urinary incontinence, urgency and urinary frequency in patients with idiopathic OAB.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tiazóis / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa / Agentes Urológicos / Acetanilidas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tiazóis / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa / Agentes Urológicos / Acetanilidas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article