Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continued emissions of carbon tetrachloride from the United States nearly two decades after its phaseout for dispersive uses.
Hu, Lei; Montzka, Stephen A; Miller, Ben R; Andrews, Arlyn E; Miller, John B; Lehman, Scott J; Sweeney, Colm; Miller, Scot M; Thoning, Kirk; Siso, Carolina; Atlas, Elliot L; Blake, Donald R; de Gouw, Joost; Gilman, Jessica B; Dutton, Geoff; Elkins, James W; Hall, Bradley; Chen, Huilin; Fischer, Marc L; Mountain, Marikate E; Nehrkorn, Thomas; Biraud, Sebastien C; Moore, Fred L; Tans, Pieter.
Afiliação
  • Hu L; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305; leihutx@gmail.com Stephen.A.Montzka@noaa.gov.
  • Montzka SA; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305; leihutx@gmail.com Stephen.A.Montzka@noaa.gov.
  • Miller BR; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Andrews AE; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Miller JB; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Lehman SJ; Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309;
  • Sweeney C; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Miller SM; Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Thoning K; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Siso C; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Atlas EL; Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149;
  • Blake DR; School of Physical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697;
  • de Gouw J; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Gilman JB; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Dutton G; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Elkins JW; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Hall B; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Chen H; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Center for Isotope Research, Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands;
  • Fischer ML; Energy Technologies Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720;
  • Mountain ME; Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, MA 02421;
  • Nehrkorn T; Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, MA 02421;
  • Biraud SC; Earth and Environmental Sciences Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720.
  • Moore FL; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
  • Tans P; Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 113(11): 2880-5, 2016 Mar 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26929368
ABSTRACT
National-scale emissions of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) are derived based on inverse modeling of atmospheric observations at multiple sites across the United States from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's flask air sampling network. We estimate an annual average US emission of 4.0 (2.0-6.5) Gg CCl4 y(-1) during 2008-2012, which is almost two orders of magnitude larger than reported to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) (mean of 0.06 Gg y(-1)) but only 8% (3-22%) of global CCl4 emissions during these years. Emissive regions identified by the observations and consistently shown in all inversion results include the Gulf Coast states, the San Francisco Bay Area in California, and the Denver area in Colorado. Both the observation-derived emissions and the US EPA TRI identified Texas and Louisiana as the largest contributors, accounting for one- to two-thirds of the US national total CCl4 emission during 2008-2012. These results are qualitatively consistent with multiple aircraft and ship surveys conducted in earlier years, which suggested significant enhancements in atmospheric mole fractions measured near Houston and surrounding areas. Furthermore, the emission distribution derived for CCl4 throughout the United States is more consistent with the distribution of industrial activities included in the TRI than with the distribution of other potential CCl4 sources such as uncapped landfills or activities related to population density (e.g., use of chlorine-containing bleach).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article