Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Percutaneous Endovascular Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Portal Obstruction: An Initial Clinical Experience.
Wu, Tian-Tian; Li, Hu-Cheng; Zheng, Fang; Ao, Guo-Kun; Lin, Hu; Li, Wei-Min.
Afiliação
  • Wu TT; Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, The 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Li HC; General Surgery Department, The 307th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100071, China.
  • Zheng F; Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, The 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Ao GK; Radiology Department, The 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Lin H; Radiology Department, The 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100091, China.
  • Li WM; Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, The 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100091, China. weimin_li_surgery@126.com.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 39(7): 994-1000, 2016 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26943811
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The Habib™ VesOpen Catheter is a new endovascular radiofrequency ablation (RFA) device used to treat malignant portal obstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of RFA with this device.

METHODS:

We collected the clinical records and follow-up data of patients with malignant portal obstruction treated with percutaneous endovascular portal RFA using the Habib™ VesOpen Catheter. Procedure-related complications, improvement of symptoms, portal patency, survival, and postoperative biochemical tests were investigated.

RESULTS:

The 31 patients enrolled in the study underwent 41 successful endovascular portal RFA procedures. Patients were divided into a portal-stenting (PS) group (n = 13), which underwent subsequent portal stenting with self-expandable metallic stents, and a non-stenting (NS) group (n = 18), which did not undergo stenting. No procedure-related abdominal hemorrhage or portal rupture occurred. Postablation complications included abdominal pain (n = 26), fever (n = 13), and pleural effusion (n = 15). Improvements in clinical manifestations were observed in 27 of the 31 patients. Of the 17 patients experiencing portal restenosis, 10 underwent successful repeat RFA. The rate of successful repeat RFA was significantly higher in the NS group than in the PS group. Median portal patency was shorter in the PS group than in the NS group. No mortality occurred during the 4 weeks after percutaneous endovascular portal RFA.

CONCLUSIONS:

Percutaneous endovascular portal RFA is a feasible and safe therapeutic option for malignant portal obstruction. Prospective investigations should be performed to evaluate clinical efficacy, in particular, the need to evaluate the necessity for subsequent portal stenting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Doenças Vasculares / Ablação por Cateter / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Procedimentos Endovasculares / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Doenças Vasculares / Ablação por Cateter / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Procedimentos Endovasculares / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article