Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Old but not forgotten: Antibiotic allergies in General Medicine (the AGM Study).
Trubiano, Jason A; Pai Mangalore, Rekha; Baey, Yi-Wei; Le, Duy; Graudins, Linda V; Charles, Patrick G P; Johnson, Douglas F; Aung, Ar Kar.
Afiliação
  • Trubiano JA; Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC jason.trubiano@austin.org.au.
  • Pai Mangalore R; Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Baey YW; Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Le D; Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Graudins LV; Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Charles PG; Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Johnson DF; Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Aung AK; Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC.
Med J Aust ; 204(7): 273, 2016 Apr 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27078602
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the nature, prevalence and description accuracy of recorded antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) in a cohort of general medical inpatients, and to assess the feasibility of an oral antibiotic re-challenge study.

DESIGN:

Multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS:

All patients admitted to the general medical units of Austin Health and Alfred Health, 18 May - 5 June 2015. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Baseline demographics, medical and allergy history, infection diagnoses and antibiotic prescribing data for general medical inpatients were collected. A questionnaire was administered to clarify AAL history, followed by correlation of responses with electronic and admissions record descriptions. A hypothetical oral re-challenge in a supervised setting was offered to patients with low risk allergy phenotypes (non-immediate reaction, non-severe cutaneous adverse reaction, or unknown reaction more than 10 years ago).

RESULTS:

Of the 453 inpatients, 107 (24%) had an AAL (median age, 82 years; interquartile range, 74-87 years); 160 individual AALs were recorded, and there was a mismatch in AAL description between recording platforms in 25% of cases. Most patients with an AAL were women (64%; P < 0.001), and more presented with concurrent immunosuppression than those without an AAL (23% v 8%; P < 0.001). ß-Lactam penicillins were employed less frequently in patients with an AAL (16% v 35%; P = 0.02), while ceftriaxone (32% v 20%; P = 0.02) and fluoroquinolones (6% v 2%; P = 0.04) were used more often. Fifty-four per cent of patients with AALs were willing to undergo oral re-challenge, of whom 48% had a low risk allergy phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS:

AAL prevalence in general medical inpatients was 24%, and was associated with excessive use of broad spectrum antibiotics. Allergies in a large proportion of patients with AALs were incorrectly documented, and were non-immune-mediated and potentially amenable to oral re-challenge. A direct oral re-challenge study in carefully selected patients with low risk allergy phenotypes appears feasible.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipersensibilidade a Drogas / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipersensibilidade a Drogas / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article