Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Choosing which ear to implant in adult candidates with functional residual hearing.
Fielden, Claire A; Mehta, Rajnikant L; Kitterick, Pádraig T.
Afiliação
  • Fielden CA; a NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit , Ropewalk House, Nottingham NG1 5DU , UK.
  • Mehta RL; b Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre , Nottingham NG7 2UH , UK.
  • Kitterick PT; c Midlands Hearing Implant Programme , University Hospital Birmingham , Birmingham B15 2TH , UK.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 17 Suppl 1: 47-50, 2016 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27099111
This study examined whether audiologists consider the potential benefits of contralateral hearing aid use following cochlear implantation when recommending which ear to implant in UK adult candidates with residual hearing. Thirty-four audiologists from providers of adult implantation services completed a decision-choice experiment. Clinicians were willing to consider recommending that the poorer ear be implanted, provided it had been aided continuously, suggesting that their decision making seeks to preserve access to residual hearing in the non-implanted ear where possible. Future approaches to determining candidacy should therefore consider that a sub-set of patients may obtain additional benefit from this residual hearing following implantation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Correção de Deficiência Auditiva / Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear / Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Perda Auditiva Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Correção de Deficiência Auditiva / Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear / Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Perda Auditiva Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article