Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality of life, long-term survivors and long-term outcome from the ABC-02 study.
Bridgewater, John; Lopes, Andre; Palmer, Daniel; Cunningham, David; Anthoney, Alan; Maraveyas, Anthony; Madhusudan, Srinivasan; Iveson, Tim; Valle, Juan; Wasan, Harpreet.
Afiliação
  • Bridgewater J; UCL Cancer Institute, UCL, London WC1E 6DD, UK.
  • Lopes A; UCL and CRUK Clinical Trials Centre, UCL, London W1T 4TJ, UK.
  • Palmer D; Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
  • Cunningham D; Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK.
  • Anthoney A; Department of Oncology, St. James's Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
  • Maraveyas A; Department of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull HU16 5JQ, UK.
  • Madhusudan S; Department of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
  • Iveson T; Department of Oncology, Southampton University Hospitals, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
  • Valle J; The University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
  • Wasan H; Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK.
Br J Cancer ; 114(9): 965-71, 2016 04 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27115567
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The ABC-02 (Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer) study established cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) as the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC). We examine quality of life (QoL), describe the long-term survivors and provide a long-term outcome.

METHODS:

A total of 410 BTC patients were randomised to receive either CisGem or gemcitabine alone (Gem); 324 patients consented to complete EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PAN26 QoL questionnaires; 268 (83%) patients returned at least one QoL questionnaire (134 in each arm). Long-term survivors were defined as those surviving over 2 years and we performed a final analysis of the primary outcome; overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

Most QoL scales showed a trend favouring the combined CisGem arm, including functional and symptomatic scales, although the differences were not statistically significant. Forty-five (11%)) patients survived at least 2 years (34 received CisGem and 11 Gem) and 21 (5%) 3 years or more (14 received CisGem and 7 Gem). After a median follow-up of 9.2 months and 398 deaths, the median OS was 11.7 months for CisGem and 8.1 months for Gem (hazard ratio (HR)=0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.79, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The survival advantage of CisGem compared to Gem was not associated with an improvement or deterioration of QoL. Long-term survivors were more likely to have received CisGem and the long-term OS is identical to that previously described.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article