Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Redo Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: One-Step or Two-Step Procedure?
Theunissen, Caroline M J; Guelinckx, Nele; Maring, John K; Langenhoff, Barbara S.
Afiliação
  • Theunissen CM; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Dr. Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands. c.m.j.theunissen@gmail.com.
  • Guelinckx N; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Dr. Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Maring JK; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Dr. Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Langenhoff BS; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Dr. Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Obes Surg ; 26(11): 2675-2682, 2016 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27117752
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The adjustable gastric band (AGB) is a bariatric procedure that used to be widely performed. However, AGB failure-signifying band-related complications or unsatisfactory weight loss, resulting in revision surgery (redo operations)-frequently occurs. Often this entails a conversion to a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). This can be performed as a one-step or two-step (separate band removal) procedure.

METHODS:

Data were collected from patients operated from 2012 to 2014 in a single bariatric centre. We compared 107 redo LRYGB after AGB failure with 1020 primary LRYGB. An analysis was performed of the one-step vs. two-step redo procedures. All redo procedures were performed by experienced bariatric surgeons.

RESULTS:

No difference in major complication rate was seen (2.8 vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.73) between redo and primary LRYGB, and overall complication severity for redos was low (mainly Clavien-Dindo 1 or 2). Weight loss results were comparable for primary and redo procedures. The one-step and two-step redos were comparable regarding complication rates and readmissions. The operating time for the one-step redo LRYGB was 136 vs. 107.5 min for the two-step (median, p < 0.001), excluding the operating time of separate AGB removal (mean 61 min, range 36-110).

CONCLUSIONS:

Removal of a failed AGB and LRYGB in a one-step procedure is safe when performed by experienced bariatric surgeons. However, when erosion or perforation of the AGB occurs, we advise caution and would perform the redo LRYGB as a two-step procedure. Equal weights can be achieved at 1 year post redo LRYGB as after primary LRYGB procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Gastroplastia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Gastroplastia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article