Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bioequivalence study with lapatinib powder for oral suspension and the original tablet formulation in cancer patients.
Koch, Kevin M; Ferron-Brady, Geraldine; Lemmon, Colleen; Cartee, Leanne; Hollyfield, Hedy; D'Amelio, Anthony M; Piepszak, Alexandra; Swaby, Ramona F; Curran, David; Arya, Niki.
Afiliação
  • Koch KM; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Ferron-Brady G; GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
  • Lemmon C; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Cartee L; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Hollyfield H; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • D'Amelio AM; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
  • Piepszak A; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Swaby RF; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
  • Curran D; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
  • Arya N; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev ; 4(3): 203-9, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27140800
ABSTRACT
Lapatinib is approved for use in various therapeutic combinations for treating metastatic breast cancers that over-express HER2. To deliver the approved doses, up to six large tablets need to be ingested with the current 250-mg tablets. For ease of ingestion, a powder for oral suspension was developed. This study was an open-label, randomized, adaptive design, two-period crossover bioequivalence study of the powder for suspension relative to the commercial tablet at steady state following once daily dosing for 7 days in patients with advanced cancer. To minimize the number of cancer patients required for a pivotal bioequivalence study (144 in this case), a four-stage adaptive group sequential design with interim analyses after every 36 subjects was implemented to allow for early termination. Bioequivalence for the oral suspension relative to the commercial tablet was demonstrated in both the first (and only) interim analysis and the final analysis, as the 90% confidence intervals for the treatment comparison ratios for both AUC0-24 and Cmax were contained within the acceptance criteria (0.80, 1.25). Additionally, there was no statistical difference in tlag or tmax , suggesting no difference in the absorption rate between treatments. There were no unexpected safety findings during this study.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quinazolinas / Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases / Neoplasias / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quinazolinas / Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases / Neoplasias / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article