Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Slice Encoding for Metal Artefact Correction in magnetic resonance imaging examinations for radiotherapy planning.
Schmidt, Maria A; Panek, Rafal; Colgan, Ruth; Hughes, Julie; Sohaib, Aslam; Saran, Frank; Murray, Julia; Bernard, Jason; Revell, Patrick; Nittka, Mathias; Leach, Martin O; Hansen, Vibeke N.
Afiliação
  • Schmidt MA; The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, CR-UK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre, Sutton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: maria.schmidt@icr.ac.uk.
  • Panek R; The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, CR-UK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre, Sutton, United Kingdom.
  • Colgan R; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Department, Sutton, United Kingdom.
  • Hughes J; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiology Department, Sutton, United Kingdom.
  • Sohaib A; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiology Department, Sutton, United Kingdom.
  • Saran F; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Neuro-Oncology Unit, Sutton, United Kingdom.
  • Murray J; Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy and Imaging Department, Sutton, United Kingdom.
  • Bernard J; St George's Hospital NHS Trust, Orthopaedic Surgery, London, United Kingdom.
  • Revell P; Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Diagnostic Imaging, Camberley, United Kingdom.
  • Nittka M; Siemens Healthcare Limited, Diagnostic Imaging, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Leach MO; The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, CR-UK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre, Sutton, United Kingdom.
  • Hansen VN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Department, Sutton, United Kingdom.
Radiother Oncol ; 120(2): 356-62, 2016 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27222296
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images are degraded in the presence of metallic implants. We investigate whether SEMAC (Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction) MR is advantageous for radiotherapy (RT) planning.

METHODS:

Conventional and SEMAC MR protocols were compared (1.5T). A spine fixation device suspended in gelatine, two patients with spine fixation devices and six patients with bilateral hip replacements were scanned with both conventional and SEMAC protocols. In spine patients the visibility of the spinal canal and spinal cord was assessed; in prostate patients, the visibility of the prostate, pelvic structures and the pelvic girdle.

RESULTS:

The signal loss volume surrounding the spine fixation device was reduced by approximately 20% when the SEMAC protocol was employed, and registration errors were reduced. For spine patients, the spinal canal was completely visible only using the SEMAC protocol. In hip replacement patients, metal artifacts were local; the signal loss extended to the internal surface of the acetabulum in eight implants with conventional protocols, but only in four using SEMAC.

CONCLUSIONS:

SEMAC MR contributes towards correct co-registration of MR and CT images for RT planning, and is particularly relevant when the TV or OARs are close to implants.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próteses e Implantes / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próteses e Implantes / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article