Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy.
Mieras, Liesbeth; Anthony, Richard; van Brakel, Wim; Bratschi, Martin W; van den Broek, Jacques; Cambau, Emmanuelle; Cavaliero, Arielle; Kasang, Christa; Perera, Geethal; Reichman, Lee; Richardus, Jan Hendrik; Saunderson, Paul; Steinmann, Peter; Yew, Wing Wai.
Afiliação
  • Mieras L; Netherlands Leprosy Relief, P.O. Box 95005, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. L.Mieras@Leprastichting.nl.
  • Anthony R; Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Brakel W; Netherlands Leprosy Relief, P.O. Box 95005, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bratschi MW; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
  • van den Broek J; Independent TB and Leprosy Consultant, Helmond, The Netherlands.
  • Cambau E; French National Reference Center for Mycobacteria, Paris, France.
  • Cavaliero A; Novartis Foundation, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Kasang C; The German Leprosy and Tuberculosis Relief Association, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Perera G; Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
  • Reichman L; New Jersey Medical School Global Tuberculosis Institute, New Jersey, USA.
  • Richardus JH; Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Saunderson P; American Leprosy Missions, Greenville, USA.
  • Steinmann P; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Yew WW; Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 5(1): 46, 2016 Jun 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27268059
ABSTRACT
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for leprosy is administered as one single dose of rifampicin (SDR) to the contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients. SDR reduces the risk of developing leprosy among contacts by around 60 % in the first 2-3 years after receiving SDR. In countries where SDR is currently being implemented under routine programme conditions in defined areas, questions were raised by health authorities and professional bodies about the possible risk of inducing rifampicin resistance among the M. tuberculosis strains circulating in these areas. This issue has not been addressed in scientific literature to date. To produce an authoritative consensus statement about the risk that SDR would induce rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, a meeting was convened with tuberculosis (TB) and leprosy experts. The experts carefully reviewed and discussed the available evidence regarding the mechanisms and risk factors for the development of (multi) drug-resistance in M. tuberculosis with a view to the special situation of the use of SDR as PEP for leprosy. They concluded that SDR given to contacts of leprosy patients, in the absence of symptoms of active TB, poses a negligible risk of generating resistance in M. tuberculosis in individuals and at the population level. Thus, the benefits of SDR prophylaxis in reducing the risk of developing leprosy in contacts of new leprosy patients far outweigh the risks of generating drug resistance in M. tuberculosis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rifampina / Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos / Farmacorresistência Bacteriana / Profilaxia Pós-Exposição / Hansenostáticos / Hanseníase / Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rifampina / Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos / Farmacorresistência Bacteriana / Profilaxia Pós-Exposição / Hansenostáticos / Hanseníase / Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article