Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning identification of EEG features predicting working memory performance in schizophrenia and healthy adults.
Johannesen, Jason K; Bi, Jinbo; Jiang, Ruhua; Kenney, Joshua G; Chen, Chi-Ming A.
Afiliação
  • Johannesen JK; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Psychology Service, 116-B, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Bi J; Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
  • Jiang R; Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
  • Kenney JG; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Psychology Service, 116-B, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Chen CA; Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27375854
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With millisecond-level resolution, electroencephalographic (EEG) recording provides a sensitive tool to assay neural dynamics of human cognition. However, selection of EEG features used to answer experimental questions is typically determined a priori. The utility of machine learning was investigated as a computational framework for extracting the most relevant features from EEG data empirically.

METHODS:

Schizophrenia (SZ; n = 40) and healthy community (HC; n = 12) subjects completed a Sternberg Working Memory Task (SWMT) during EEG recording. EEG was analyzed to extract 5 frequency components (theta1, theta2, alpha, beta, gamma) at 4 processing stages (baseline, encoding, retention, retrieval) and 3 scalp sites (frontal-Fz, central-Cz, occipital-Oz) separately for correctly and incorrectly answered trials. The 1-norm support vector machine (SVM) method was used to build EEG classifiers of SWMT trial accuracy (correct vs. incorrect; Model 1) and diagnosis (HC vs. SZ; Model 2). External validity of SVM models was examined in relation to neuropsychological test performance and diagnostic classification using conventional regression-based analyses.

RESULTS:

SWMT performance was significantly reduced in SZ (p < .001). Model 1 correctly classified trial accuracy at 84 % in HC, and at 74 % when cross-validated in SZ data. Frontal gamma at encoding and central theta at retention provided highest weightings, accounting for 76 % of variance in SWMT scores and 42 % variance in neuropsychological test performance across samples. Model 2 identified frontal theta at baseline and frontal alpha during retrieval as primary classifiers of diagnosis, providing 87 % classification accuracy as a discriminant function.

CONCLUSIONS:

EEG features derived by SVM are consistent with literature reports of gamma's role in memory encoding, engagement of theta during memory retention, and elevated resting low-frequency activity in schizophrenia. Tests of model performance and cross-validation support the stability and generalizability of results, and utility of SVM as an analytic approach for EEG feature selection.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article