Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Process evaluation of two participatory approaches: Implementing total worker health® interventions in a correctional workforce.
Dugan, Alicia G; Farr, Dana A; Namazi, Sara; Henning, Robert A; Wallace, Kelly N; El Ghaziri, Mazen; Punnett, Laura; Dussetschleger, Jeffrey L; Cherniack, Martin G.
Afiliação
  • Dugan AG; Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut. adugan@uchc.edu.
  • Farr DA; Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut.
  • Namazi S; Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut.
  • Henning RA; Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
  • Wallace KN; Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut.
  • El Ghaziri M; School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts.
  • Punnett L; Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts.
  • Dussetschleger JL; Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut.
  • Cherniack MG; Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut.
Am J Ind Med ; 59(10): 897-918, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27378470
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Correctional Officers (COs) have among the highest injury rates and poorest health of all the public safety occupations. The HITEC-2 (Health Improvement Through Employee Control-2) study uses Participatory Action Research (PAR) to design and implement interventions to improve health and safety of COs.

METHOD:

HITEC-2 compared two different types of participatory program, a CO-only "Design Team" (DT) and "Kaizen Event Teams" (KET) of COs and supervisors, to determine differences in implementation process and outcomes. The Program Evaluation Rating Sheet (PERS) was developed to document and evaluate program implementation.

RESULTS:

Both programs yielded successful and unsuccessful interventions, dependent upon team-, facility-, organizational, state-, facilitator-, and intervention-level factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

PAR in corrections, and possibly other sectors, depends upon factors including participation, leadership, continuity and timing, resilience, and financial circumstances. The new PERS instrument may be useful in other sectors to assist in assessing intervention success. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59897-918, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prisões / Exposição Ocupacional / Gestão da Segurança / Traumatismos Ocupacionais Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prisões / Exposição Ocupacional / Gestão da Segurança / Traumatismos Ocupacionais Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article