Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of autologous serum eye drop for treatment of dry eyes in graft-versus-host disease.
Azari, Amir A; Karadag, Remzi; Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei; Nehls, Sarah; Barney, Neal; Kim, Kyungmann; Longo, Walter; Hematti, Peiman; Juckett, Mark.
Afiliação
  • Azari AA; a Thomas Jefferson School of Medicine , Wills Eye Hospital , Philadelphia, PA , USA.
  • Karadag R; a Thomas Jefferson School of Medicine , Wills Eye Hospital , Philadelphia, PA , USA.
  • Kanavi MR; b School of Medicine , Istanbul Medeniyet University , Istanbul , Turkey.
  • Nehls S; c Ocular Tissue Engineering Research Center , Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran.
  • Barney N; d School of Medicine and Public Health , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI , USA , and.
  • Kim K; d School of Medicine and Public Health , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI , USA , and.
  • Longo W; e Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI , USA.
  • Hematti P; d School of Medicine and Public Health , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI , USA , and.
  • Juckett M; d School of Medicine and Public Health , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI , USA , and.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol ; 36(2): 152-156, 2017 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27380960
PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) on dry eyes in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 35 patients with a history of ocular GVHD following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that used ASED to alleviate dry eye symptoms was performed. Patients were categorized into three different groups. If patients had available ophthalmic data before and after starting treatment was group 1 (n = 14), had available ophthalmic data after starting treatment in group 2 (n = 10) and had available ophthalmic data before treatment or did not have any data after starting treatment in group 3 (n = 11). Data were collected on patient's age, gender, primary diagnosis, visual acuity and fluorescein corneal staining were collected on individual eyes in order to evaluate the efficacy of the ASED on alleviating dry eye-related signs and symptoms. RESULTS: No adverse ocular effect from the ASED was found in our series (except one fungal keratitis). All patients reported either improvement (55%) or stability (45%) in their ocular symptoms upon the use of ASED. In patients with available data before and after starting treatment, the corneal staining score improved by a median of 1 (p = 0.003) and the LogMAR visual acuity had a non-significant improvement. CONCLUSION: In our study, ASED used by patients with ocular GVHD were both safe and effective. ASED should be considered in patients with GVHD who suffer from dry eyes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Soluções Oftálmicas / Síndromes do Olho Seco / Soro / Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro / Imunoterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Soluções Oftálmicas / Síndromes do Olho Seco / Soro / Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro / Imunoterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article