Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Brain imaging with synthetic MR in children: clinical quality assessment.
Betts, Aaron M; Leach, James L; Jones, Blaise V; Zhang, Bin; Serai, Suraj.
Afiliação
  • Betts AM; Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, ML 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. ambetts@me.com.
  • Leach JL; Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, ML 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
  • Jones BV; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Zhang B; Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, ML 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
  • Serai S; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Neuroradiology ; 58(10): 1017-1026, 2016 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27438803
INTRODUCTION: Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging is a quantitative imaging technique that measures inherent T1-relaxation, T2-relaxation, and proton density. These inherent tissue properties allow synthesis of various imaging sequences from a single acquisition. Clinical use of synthetic MR imaging has been described in adult populations. However, use of synthetic MR imaging has not been previously reported in children. The purpose of this study is to report our assessment of diagnostic image quality using synthetic MR imaging in children. METHODS: Synthetic MR acquisition was obtained in a sample of children undergoing brain MR imaging. Image quality assessments were performed on conventional and synthetic T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Standardized linear measurements were performed on conventional and synthetic T2 images. Estimates of patient age based upon myelination patterns were also performed. RESULTS: Conventional and synthetic MR images were evaluated on 30 children. Using a 4-point assessment scale, conventional imaging performed better than synthetic imaging for T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. When the assessment was simplified to a dichotomized scale, the conventional and synthetic T1-weighted and T2-weighted images performed similarly. However, the superiority of conventional FLAIR images persisted in the dichotomized assessment. There were no statistically significant differences between linear measurements made on T2-weighted images. Estimates of patient age based upon pattern of myelination were also similar between conventional and synthetic techniques. CONCLUSION: Synthetic MR imaging may be acceptable for clinical use in children. However, users should be aware of current limitations that could impact clinical utility in the software version used in this study.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Encéfalo / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Encéfalo / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article