Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does residual microscopic disease after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer translate into a good clinical outcome?
Geva, R; Davidovics, H; Soyfer, S; Pelles-Avraham, S; Klausner, J M; Inbar, M; Tulchinsky, H.
Afiliação
  • Geva R; Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Davidovics H; Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Soyfer S; Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Pelles-Avraham S; Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Klausner JM; Division of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Inbar M; Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Tulchinsky H; Division of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Colorectal Dis ; 19(3): 237-242, 2017 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27474791
AIM: This study aimed to assess the progression-free and overall survival of patients with residual microscopic disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and rectal resection for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHOD: Two-hundred and thirty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients who had neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection (from May 2000 to April 2012) were divided according to pathological tumour response: residual microscopic disease (MIC), complete response (pCR) and partial/no response (non-CR). Data on the neoadjuvant regime, treatment-to-surgery interval, final pathology, type of operation, operative time, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, disease recurrence and mortality were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were 13 (5.5%) MIC patients, 48 (20.5%) with pCR and 173 (73.9%) with non-CR group. The groups were demographically comparable. MIC patients had more retrieved lymph nodes compared with the non-CR and pCR patients (median 13 compared with 8 and 10, respectively, P = 0.0086). The 5-year overall survival rates were 93.4% for the pCR and MIC patients vs 82.1% for the non-CR patients (P = 0.0324). The 5-year progression-free survival was 85.2% for the pCR and MIC patients vs 73.8% for the non-CR patients (P = 0.086). CONCLUSION: We have identified and assessed a new pathological subgroup of rectal cancer patients who had residual microscopic disease after neoadjuvant therapy. The survival analysis aligned them closely with pCR patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Reto / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Adenocarcinoma / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Reto / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Adenocarcinoma / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article