Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of biomechanical properties: are porcine flexor tendons and bovine extensor tendons eligible surrogates for human tendons in in vitro studies?
Domnick, C; Wieskötter, B; Raschke, M J; Schulze, M; Kronenberg, D; Wefelmeier, M; Langer, M F; Herbort, M.
Afiliação
  • Domnick C; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University Muenster, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany. christoph.domnick@uni-muenster.de.
  • Wieskötter B; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University Muenster, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
  • Raschke MJ; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University Muenster, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
  • Schulze M; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University Muenster, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
  • Kronenberg D; Institute of Experimental Musculoskeletal Medicine, Westphalian Wilhelms University Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Wefelmeier M; Department of Operative Dentistry, Westphalian Wilhelms University Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Langer MF; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University Muenster, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
  • Herbort M; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University Muenster, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 136(10): 1465-71, 2016 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27475640
INTRODUCTION: Porcine flexor tendons, bovine extensor tendons, and human (semitendinosus) tendons are frequently used as substitutes for human ACL grafts in biomechanical in vitro studies. This study compares the biomechanical properties and structural differences of these tendons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this biomechanical study, fresh-frozen porcine flexor tendons, bovine extensor tendons, and human semitendinosus tendons were used (n = 36). The tendons were mounted in a uniaxial testing machine (Zwick/Roell) with cryo-clamps, leaving a 60 mm tendon part free between the two clamps. Specimens have been loaded to failure to evaluate the biomechanical parameters stiffness, yield load, and maximum load. A Total Collagen Assay Kit was used to detect differences in the total collagen type I concentration (n = 30). A one-way ANOVA was performed to detect differences in the means. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the stiffness between the groups (bovine 194 ± 43 N/mm, porcine 211 ± 63 N/mm, and human cadaveric 208 ± 58 N/mm). The yield and maximum loads were high (>1000 N) in all groups, but they were significantly increased in both animal specimens (means of 1681-1795 N) compared with human cadaveric specimen (means of 1289-1406 N; p < 0.01). No difference in the collagen type I concentration was detected (N.S.). CONCLUSION: Porcine flexor and bovine extensor tendons are eligible substitutes with similar stiffness and high failure loads compared with human cadaveric semitendinosus tendons in in vitro studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Suínos / Tendões / Técnicas In Vitro / Bovinos / Modelos Animais / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Suínos / Tendões / Técnicas In Vitro / Bovinos / Modelos Animais / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article