Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and Radiological Study Focused on Relief of Low Back Pain After Decompression Surgery in Selected Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Ikuta, Ko; Masuda, Keigo; Tominaga, Fuyuki; Sakuragi, Takahide; Kai, Kazuhiro; Kitamura, Takahiro; Senba, Hideyuki; Shidahara, Satoshi.
Afiliação
  • Ikuta K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, Karatsu, Saga, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 41(24): E1434-E1443, 2016 Dec 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27488289
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the present study was to identify the clinical and radiological features of low back pain (LBP) that was relieved after decompression alone of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) associated with grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although decompression and fusion are generally the recommended surgical treatments of LDS, several authors have reported that some patients with LDS could obtain good clinical results including relief from LBP by decompression alone. The pathogenesis of relief from LBP after decompression is, however, not known.

METHODS:

Forty patients with LSS associated with grade I LDS, who underwent a minimally invasive surgical-decompression were enrolled in the present study. All patients complained preoperatively of predominantly leg-related symptoms and LBP (≥ 4 points on Numeric Rating Scale). Clinical and radiological assessments were performed 1 year after surgery (a relief of LBP Numeric Rating Scale reduction ≥3 points and valuation ≤3 points) and at the last follow-up. We conducted a comparative study between patient groups with and without the relief from LBP (groups R and N, respectively).

RESULTS:

Twenty-nine patients were distributed to group R and the remaining 11 patients to group N. Preoperatively, there was a significant difference between the two groups for age and radiographic flexibility for lumbar extension. Postoperatively, there was a positive correlation between improvement in both LBP and leg symptoms. The clinical outcomes of group R were significantly better than those of group N throughout follow-up period (mean 37 mo). In group R, sagittal lumbopelvic radiographic parameters improved significantly after surgery.

CONCLUSION:

Although the causes of LBP are varied in each patients, our results show that concomitant LSS itself might cause LBP in some patients with grade I LDS, because it involves impingement of the neural tissue and discordant sagittal lumbopelvic alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Espinal / Espondilolistese / Dor Lombar / Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Espinal / Espondilolistese / Dor Lombar / Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article