Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Post-Transplant Outcomes in High-Risk Compared with Non-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A CIBMTR Analysis.
Scott, Emma C; Hari, Parameswaran; Sharma, Manish; Le-Rademacher, Jennifer; Huang, Jiaxing; Vogl, Dan; Abidi, Muneer; Beitinjaneh, Amer; Fung, Henry; Ganguly, Siddhartha; Hildebrandt, Gerhard; Holmberg, Leona; Kalaycio, Matt; Kumar, Shaji; Kyle, Robert; Lazarus, Hillard; Lee, Cindy; Maziarz, Richard T; Meehan, Kenneth; Mikhael, Joseph; Nishihori, Taiga; Ramanathan, Muthalagu; Usmani, Saad; Tay, Jason; Vesole, David; Wirk, Baldeep; Yared, Jean; Savani, Bipin N; Gasparetto, Cristina; Krishnan, Amrita; Mark, Tomer; Nieto, Yago; D'Souza, Anita.
Afiliação
  • Scott EC; Center for Hematologic Malignancies, The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Hari P; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Sharma M; Department of Medical Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Le-Rademacher J; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Huang J; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Vogl D; Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Abidi M; Division of BMT, Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Beitinjaneh A; Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
  • Fung H; Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Ganguly S; Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
  • Hildebrandt G; Hematology and BMT, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Holmberg L; Department of Medicine and Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Kalaycio M; Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Kumar S; Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Kyle R; Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Lazarus H; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Lee C; Division of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Maziarz RT; Adult Blood and Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Meehan K; Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Mikhael J; Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona and Phoenix Children's Hospital, Scottsdale, Arizona.
  • Nishihori T; Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
  • Ramanathan M; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worchester, Massachusetts.
  • Usmani S; Department of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • Tay J; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Vesole D; Myeloma Division, John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack UMC, Hackensack, New Jersey.
  • Wirk B; Division of Bone Marrow Transplant, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
  • Yared J; Blood & Marrow Transplantation Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Savani BN; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Gasparetto C; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Krishnan A; Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Mark T; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Nieto Y; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • D'Souza A; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address: andsouza@mcw.edu.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 22(10): 1893-1899, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27496215
ABSTRACT
Conventional cytogenetics and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) identify high-risk multiple myeloma (HRM) populations characterized by poor outcomes. We analyzed these differences among HRM versus non-HRM populations after upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT). Between 2008 and 2012, 715 patients with multiple myeloma identified by FISH and/or cytogenetic data with upfront autoHCT were identified in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRM was defined as del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), hypodiploidy (<45 chromosomes excluding -Y) or chromosome 1 p and 1q abnormalities; all others were non-HRM. Among 125 HRM patients (17.5%), induction with bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents (imids) was higher compared with non-HRM (56% versus 43%, P < .001) with similar pretransplant complete response (CR) rates (14% versus 16%, P .1). At day 100 post-transplant, at least a very good partial response was 59% in HRM and 61% in non-HRM (P = .6). More HRM patients received post-transplant therapy with bortezomib and imids (26% versus 12%, P = .004). Three-year post-transplant progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in HRM versus non-HRM were 37% versus 49% (P < .001) and 72% versus 85% (P < .001), respectively. At 3 years, PFS for HRM patients with and without post-transplant therapy was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33 to 59) versus 14% (95% CI, 4 to 29) and in non-HRM patients with and without post-transplant therapy 55% (95% CI, 49 to 62) versus 39% (95% CI, 32 to 47); rates of OS for HRM patients with and without post-transplant therapy were 81% (95% CI, 70 to 90) versus 48% (95% CI, 30 to 65) compared with 88% (95% CI, 84 to 92) and 79% (95% CI, 73 to 85) in non-HRM patients with and without post-transplant therapy, respectively. Among patients receiving post-transplant therapy, there was no difference in OS between HRM and non-HRM (P = .08). In addition to HRM, higher stage, less than a CR pretransplant, lack of post-transplant therapy, and African American race were associated with worse OS. In conclusion, we show HRM patients achieve similar day 100 post-transplant responses compared with non-HRM patients, but these responses are not sustained. Post-transplant therapy appeared to improve the poor outcomes of HRM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medição de Risco / Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medição de Risco / Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article