Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: A pure, minimally invasive approach.
Chen, Po-Da; Wu, Chao-Ying; Hu, Rey-Heng; Ho, Cheng-Maw; Lee, Po-Huang; Lai, Hong-Shiee; Lin, Ming-Tsan; Wu, Yao-Ming.
Afiliação
  • Chen PD; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Wu CY; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Hu RH; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Ho CM; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lee PH; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lai HS; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lin MT; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Wu YM; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. wyaoming@gmail.com.
Liver Transpl ; 22(11): 1509-1518, 2016 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27509325
ABSTRACT
Right hepatectomy for a living liver donor via a pure minimally invasive approach is a challenging procedure and only a few cases have been reported. Between May 2013 and August 2015, 13 patients underwent robotic living donor right hepatectomy in our institute, and 54 patients received open surgery. In this series, no conversion was conducted for robotic donor right hepatectomy. The 2 groups shared similar blood loss (169 versus 146 mL), complication rates (7.7% versus 9.3%), and recovery of donor liver function (peak alanine aminotransferase, 269 versus 252 IU/mL). The robotic group needed longer operation time (596 versus 383 minutes) but less postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (0.58 versus 0.84 ng/kg) and a shorter period before returning to work/school (52.9 versus 100.0 days) and sex (100.0 versus 156.0 days). For recipient outcomes regarding the donor procedure, the robotic group shared similar experiences in early allograft dysfunction, complications, and 1-year recipient liver function with the open group. With respect to documented benefits of minimally invasive left-sided liver donor procedure, the development of right donor hepatectomy is slow. In conclusion, with substantial improvements in patient recovery after the minimally invasive approach, the robotic platform would be a big step toward completing pure minimally invasive liver donor surgery. Liver Transplantation 22 1509-1518 2016 AASLD.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Fígado / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Hepatectomia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Fígado / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Hepatectomia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article