Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results.
Brothers, Kyle B; East, Kelly M; Kelley, Whitley V; Wright, M Frances; Westbrook, Matthew J; Rich, Carla A; Bowling, Kevin M; Lose, Edward J; Bebin, E Martina; Simmons, Shirley; Myers, John A; Barsh, Greg; Myers, Richard M; Cooper, Greg M; Pulley, Jill M; Rothstein, Mark A; Clayton, Ellen Wright.
Afiliação
  • Brothers KB; Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
  • East KM; Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy, and Law, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
  • Kelley WV; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  • Wright MF; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  • Westbrook MJ; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Rich CA; Saint Louis University School of Law and College for Public Health & Social Justice, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Bowling KM; Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
  • Lose EJ; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  • Bebin EM; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Simmons S; Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Myers JA; Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Barsh G; Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
  • Myers RM; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  • Cooper GM; Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Pulley JM; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  • Rothstein MA; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  • Clayton EW; Research Support Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Genet Med ; 19(3): 337-344, 2017 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27561086
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Eliciting and understanding patient and research participant preferences regarding return of secondary test results are key aspects of genomic medicine. A valid instrument should be easily understood without extensive pretest counseling while still faithfully eliciting patients' preferences.

METHODS:

We conducted focus groups with 110 adults to understand patient perspectives on secondary genomic findings and the role that preferences should play. We then developed and refined a draft instrument and used it to elicit preferences from parents participating in a genomic sequencing study in children with intellectual disabilities.

RESULTS:

Patients preferred filtering of secondary genomic results to avoid information overload and to avoid learning what the future holds, among other reasons. Patients preferred to make autonomous choices about which categories of results to receive and to have their choices applied automatically before results are returned to them and their clinicians. The Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results (PIGSR) is designed to be completed by patients or research participants without assistance and to guide bioinformatic analysis of genomic raw data. Most participants wanted to receive all secondary results, but a significant minority indicated other preferences.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our novel instrument-PIGSR-should be useful in a wide variety of clinical and research settings.Genet Med 19 3, 337-344.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article