Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the direct flow medical prosthesis: Impact of native aortic valve calcification degree on outcomes.
D'Ancona, Giuseppe; Agma, Hüseyin U; Ince, Hüseyin; El-Achkar, Gihan; Dißmann, Martin; Ortak, Jasmin; Kische, Stephan.
Afiliação
  • D'Ancona G; Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain und Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
  • Agma HU; Heart Center, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
  • Ince H; Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain und Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
  • El-Achkar G; Heart Center, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
  • Dißmann M; Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain und Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
  • Ortak J; Heart Center, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
  • Kische S; Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 89(1): 135-142, 2017 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27739165
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We present our single center experience with the direct flow medical (DFM) prosthesis addressing the impact of native aortic valve (AV) calcification degree on outcomes.

BACKGROUND:

The DFM® has been introduced for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The valve has a nonmetallic and inflatable support structure.

METHODS:

Patients were divided in two groups according to preoperative cardiac computed tomography (CT) group I moderate calcification and group II heavy calcification of the total AV area. We evaluated 118 patients 53 (45%) group I and 65 (55%) group II.

RESULTS:

Preoperative trans-AV gradient and calcification extension across the aortic unit were significantly higher in group II (P = 0.008 and P < 0.0001). CT perimeter derived annular diameter (group I 24.7 ± 2.1 mm vs. group II 24.8 ± 1.9; P = 0.6) and implanted prosthesis size (group I 26.1 ± 1.5 mm vs. group II 25.7 ± 1.5; P = 0.1) were similar. Hemodynamics were similar mean gradient 16.1 ± 5.9 mm Hg (group I) vs. 17.3 ± 6.5 mm Hg (group II) (P = 0.3). Total aortic regurgitation (AR) was mild in 5.7% in group I and 20% in group II (P = 0.03). None developed moderate/severe AR. Heavy AV calcification was the sole independent determinant for mild regurgitation (P = 0.02; OR = 7; 95% CI 1.2-37.6). Follow-up (289 days; 40-760 days) estimated survival was 88.1% (group I) and 93.8% (group II) (P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS:

Independent of AV calcification degree, adequate sizing and implantation can be achieved with the DFM®. Although higher burden of calcification increases the rate of mild AR, no patient developed moderate and severe AR. Short-term estimated survival was not influenced by calcification degree. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Bioprótese / Calcinose / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Cateterismo Cardíaco / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged80 País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Bioprótese / Calcinose / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Cateterismo Cardíaco / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged80 País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article