Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Beating Heart Validation of Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Pericardiotomy Tool.
Killu, Ammar M; Naksuk, Niyada; Desimone, Christopher V; Gaba, Prakriti; Suddendorf, Scott; Powers, Joanne; Ladewig, Dorothy J; Lerman, Lilach O; Borlaug, Barry A; Asirvatham, Samuel J.
Afiliação
  • Killu AM; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Naksuk N; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Desimone CV; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Gaba P; Mayo Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Suddendorf S; Department of Surgical Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Powers J; Department of Surgical Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Ladewig DJ; Mayo Clinic Ventures, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Lerman LO; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Borlaug BA; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Asirvatham SJ; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 28(3): 357-361, 2017 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27759180
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Epicardial procedures frequently require pericardial manipulation. We aimed to develop a nonsurgical percutaneous pericardial modification tool that may (1) facilitate epicardial-based procedures by enabling adhesiolysis or (2) attenuate the myocardial constraining effect of the pericardium.

METHODS:

Three novel devices were developed to enable pericardiotomy, all of which can be deployed in over-the-wire fashion following percutaneous epicardial access. The grasper permits us to seize the pericardial membrane providing leverage for incision. The scissors enables anterograde cutting maneuvers. The reverse-slitter allows retrograde incisions; in addition, this device has a deflectable tip that increases the potential cutting area. We optimized these tools for safety by including electrodes to test for phrenic nerve stimulation as well as myocardial stimulation to determine directionality of the cutting devices. The base of the scissors and reverse-slitter are also blunt ensuring that the cutting element is always away from the myocardium.

RESULTS:

Following 5 nonbeating heart bench test experiments for prototype development, 11 animal (9 canine, 2 swine) studies were performed. Of these 2 were proof-of-concept open chest studies; the remaining 9 were entirely closed-chest, percutaneous procedures allowing for remodification of the prototypes. The tools successfully permitted incision of the pericardium in all studies. Hemodynamic measurements were assessed postincision and showed no compromise of systolic function. No coronary artery or phrenic nerve damage was seen in any study.

CONCLUSION:

Percutaneous pericardiotomy is feasible and appears to be safe. It may provide leverage in epicardial-based procedures and offer treatment options in disease processes characterized by pericardial restraint.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pericárdio / Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Pericardiectomia / Cateterismo Cardíaco / Frequência Cardíaca Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pericárdio / Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Pericardiectomia / Cateterismo Cardíaco / Frequência Cardíaca Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article