Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Students' Food Intake from Home-Packed Lunches in the Traditional versus Balanced School Day.
Neilson, Lisa J; Macaskill, Lesley A; Luk, Jonathan M H; Sharma, Navreeti; Killip, Steve M; Salvadori, Marina I; Seabrook, Jamie A; Dworatzek, Paula D N.
Afiliação
  • Neilson LJ; a Division of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College at Western University, London, ON.
  • Macaskill LA; a Division of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College at Western University, London, ON.
  • Luk JM; a Division of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College at Western University, London, ON.
  • Sharma N; a Division of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College at Western University, London, ON.
  • Killip SM; b Thames Valley District School Board, London, ON.
  • Salvadori MI; c Department of Paediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON.
  • Seabrook JA; a Division of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College at Western University, London, ON.
  • Dworatzek PD; c Department of Paediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON.
Can J Diet Pract Res ; 78(1): 3-10, 2017 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27779893
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the type and quantity of foods children brought and consumed at school in the balanced school day (BSD), with two 20-minute eating periods, versus the traditional schedule (TS), with one 20-minute lunch.

METHODS:

Direct observation identified food items and amounts in BSD and TS lunches of grade 3 and 4 students (n = 321).

RESULTS:

The mean (SD) servings of foods packed in BSD lunches were significantly higher than the TS lunches for milk and alternatives (0.69 (0.70) vs 0.47 (0.49), P = 0.02), sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs; 0.91 (1.24) vs 0.57 (0.99), P = 0.01), and snacks (2.74 (1.55) vs 2.24 (1.48), P < 0.01). Regardless of schedule, only 40.8% of students had vegetables packed in their lunch, whereas 92.8% had snacks. When comparing foods eaten, SSBs and snacks remained significantly higher in the BSD (0.75 (1.02) vs 0.48 (0.83), P = 0.03; 2.37 (1.44) vs 1.93 (1.36), P = 0.01, respectively). The proportion of children (%) whose consumption met one-third of Canada's Food Guide recommendations for vegetables and fruit was low (27.5% BSD, 31.0% TS).

CONCLUSIONS:

The BSD may have unintended negative consequences on the type and amount of foods packed in school lunches. Support for families should focus on encouraging more vegetables and fruit and fewer SSBs and snacks in packed lunches.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instituições Acadêmicas / Estudantes / Dieta / Almoço Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instituições Acadêmicas / Estudantes / Dieta / Almoço Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article