Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Paediatric emergency department-based carbon monoxide detector intervention: a randomised trial.
McKenzie, Lara B; Roberts, Kristin J; Kaercher, Roxanne M; Collins, Christy L; Comstock, R Dawn; Fernandez, Soledad; Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud; Casavant, Marcel J; Mihalov, Leslie.
Afiliação
  • McKenzie LB; Center for Injury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Roberts KJ; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Kaercher RM; Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Collins CL; Center for Injury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Comstock RD; Center for Injury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Fernandez S; OhioHealth Research & Innovations Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Abdel-Rasoul M; Dept. of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health and Dept. of Pediatrics, Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Casavant MJ; Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Mihalov L; Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Inj Prev ; 23(5): 314-320, 2017 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28007971
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although non-fire-related carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is almost entirely preventable, over 400 people die and 20 000 people are injured each year in the USA from unintentional CO poisoning. Thus, there is a critical need for evidence-based interventions for preventing CO poisoning and increasing the proper use and installation of CO detectors.

METHODS:

A randomised, controlled trial (Project CODE, a Carbon Monoxide Detector Education intervention) with 2-week and 6-month follow-up home observations was conducted in 299 parents of children aged ≤18 years recruited in the emergency department of a level 1 paediatric trauma centre. The intervention group received an educational tool, a spiral-bound, laminated booklet that resembled a CO detector containing theory-based safety messages based on the precaution adoption process model, a plug-in CO detector and 9 V battery. The control group received a one page flyer on CO poisoning prevention.

RESULTS:

Although the difference was not statistically significant, mean CO knowledge score increased at a greater rate for the intervention group than the control group. Intervention group parents were more likely to exhibit 'safe' CO detector use than control group parents at the 2-week follow-up (RR 2.75; 95% CI 2.06 to 3.69) and 6-month follow-up (RR 2.78; 95% CI 2.06 to 3.76), after adjusting for self-reported CO detector use behaviour at enrolment and annual per capita income.

CONCLUSIONS:

An emergency department-delivered intervention containing a theory-based educational tool paired with a CO detector can be an effective method for increasing knowledge about CO poisoning, for prevention and for appropriate use of a CO detector. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00959478.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pais / Monóxido de Carbono / Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono / Acidentes Domésticos / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Prevenção de Acidentes Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Child / Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pais / Monóxido de Carbono / Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono / Acidentes Domésticos / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Prevenção de Acidentes Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Child / Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article