Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A pilot cadaveric study of temperature and adjacent tissue changes after exposure of magnetic-controlled growing rods to MRI.
Poon, Selina; Nixon, Ryan; Wendolowski, Stephen; Gecelter, Rachel; Chen, Yen Hsun; DiMauro, Jon-Paul; Amaral, Terry; Graver, Adam; Grande, Daniel A.
Afiliação
  • Poon S; Department of Orthopaedics, Shriners Hospitals for Children, 3160 Geneva Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90020, USA. spoon@shrinenet.org.
  • Nixon R; Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Lake Success, NY, USA.
  • Wendolowski S; Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Lake Success, NY, USA.
  • Gecelter R; Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Lake Success, NY, USA.
  • Chen YH; Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Lake Success, NY, USA.
  • DiMauro JP; Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Lake Success, NY, USA.
  • Amaral T; Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Lake Success, NY, USA.
  • Graver A; Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Lake Success, NY, USA.
  • Grande DA; Orthopedic Research Laboratory, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Eur Spine J ; 26(6): 1618-1623, 2017 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28070684
PURPOSE: To test for possible thermal injury and tissue damage caused by magnetic-controlled growing rods (MCGRs) during MRI scans. METHODS: Three fresh frozen cadavers were utilized. Four MRI scans were performed: baseline, after spinal hardware implantation, and twice after MCGR implantation. Cross connectors were placed at the proximal end and at the distal end of the construct, making a complete circuit hinged at those two points. Three points were identified as potential sites for significant heating: adjacent to the proximal and distal cross connectors and adjacent to the actuators. Data collected included tissue temperatures at baseline (R1), after screw insertion (R2), and twice after rod insertions (R3 and R4). Tissue samples were taken and stained for signs of heat damage. RESULTS: There was a slight change in tissue temperature in the regions next to the implants between baseline and after each scan. Average temperatures (°C) increased by 0.94 (0.16-1.63) between R1 and R2, 1.6 (1.23-1.97) between R2 and R3, and 0.39 (0.03-0.83) between R3 and R4. Subsequent histological analysis revealed no signs of heat induced damage. CONCLUSION: Recurrent MRI scans of patients with MCGRs may be necessary over the course of treatment. When implanted into human cadaveric tissue, these rods appear to not be a risk to the patient with respect to heating or tissue damage. Further in vivo study is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escoliose / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Osteogênese por Distração / Imãs / Temperatura Alta Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escoliose / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Osteogênese por Distração / Imãs / Temperatura Alta Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article