Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of students and curriculum on self-study during clinical training in medical school: a multilevel approach.
Barbosa, J; Silva, A; Ferreira, M A; Severo, M.
Afiliação
  • Barbosa J; Department of Simulation and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. joselina@med.up.pt.
  • Silva A; Undergraduate Education Department, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Ferreira MA; Department of Simulation and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Severo M; Department of Simulation and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
BMC Med Educ ; 17(1): 9, 2017 Jan 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28086868
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In higher education, the focus has shifted from the acquisition of knowledge to learning objectives and skills. This means that, the majority of student learning time is spent independently working outside the classroom. Students take an active role in setting goals, deciding how to achieve them, and planning individual study time. Although extensive research has recognized the importance of curriculum and students' characteristics in time devoted to self-study, it is still unclear to what extent these variables affect time to study. Due to the growing reliance on self-directed learning in medical education, and in an attempt to elucidate this issue, this research aims to evaluate self-study time during clinical training and assess whether this is more influenced by the student or the curriculum.

METHODS:

A questionnaire was given to 1220 medical students (43.3% of the enrolled students). The students were asked to indicate the average number of study hours per week beyond the time allocated to classes for each clerkship (rotation) attended. Variation and generalizability of students' self-study were estimated using linear mixed models.

RESULTS:

Findings showed that the intrinsic differences within students were a greater source of variation in self-study time than differences within clerkships (56.0% vs. 6.9%). If the amount of self-study dedicated to an individual clerkship is to be determined, at least 32 students are needed to achieve acceptable reliability. However, this data with two clerkships per student can used to retrospectively measure the self-study reported by students in clinical training.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings suggest that, both, curriculum and student characteristics influence self-study in undergraduate clinical training. Indeed, students' characteristics play a significant role in time devoted to study. Further research should be undertaken to investigate students' characteristics that may predict self-study during undergraduate medical training.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Estágio Clínico / Currículo / Educação Médica / Aprendizagem Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Estágio Clínico / Currículo / Educação Médica / Aprendizagem Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article