Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Synchronous Ipsilateral High Submuscular Placement of Prosthetic Balloons and Reservoirs.
Kavoussi, Nicholas L; Hofer, Matthias D; Viers, Boyd R; Cordon, Billy H; Mooney, Ryan P; Pagliara, Travis J; Scott, Jeremy M; Morey, Allen F.
Afiliação
  • Kavoussi NL; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Hofer MD; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Viers BR; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Cordon BH; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Mooney RP; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Pagliara TJ; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Scott JM; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Morey AF; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: allen.morey@utsouthwestern.edu.
J Sex Med ; 14(2): 264-268, 2017 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28089244
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Synchronous ipsilateral high submuscular placement of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) pressure-regulating balloons (PRBs) and inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) reservoirs in a single submuscular tunnel is a novel strategy that could be advantageous for patients who have had major pelvic surgery.

AIM:

To report our initial experience with synchronous ipsilateral vs bilateral placement of AUS PRBs and IPP reservoirs in men undergoing implant surgery.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing synchronous AUS and IPP placement from 2007 through 2015 by a single surgeon at our tertiary center. Patients were stratified according to ipsilateral vs bilateral placement of the AUS PRB and IPP reservoir. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Reoperation rates because of infectious or erosive complications and mechanical failure were assessed.

RESULTS:

Of the 968 implant surgeries during the study period, 47 men had synchronous device placement, of whom 17 (36%) underwent ipsilateral placement of the PRB and reservoir. During a median follow-up of 19 months (range = 1-84 months), reoperations were necessary in 12 of 47 (26%) and were similar between groups (ipsilateral, 5 of 17, 29%; bilateral, 7 of 30, 23%; P = .73). Most reoperations were due to AUS-related complications (10 of 12, 83%) and nearly all patients with reoperation (10 of 12, 83%) had compromised urethras (ie, prior urethral surgery, radiation, or prior AUS implantation). The most common indication for reintervention was cuff erosion (4 of 47, 9%), with no difference between groups (ipsilateral, 3 of 17, 18%; bilateral, 1 of 30, 3%; P = .13).

CONCLUSION:

Synchronous ipsilateral high submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons could safely facilitate prosthetic surgery in patients with a history of major pelvic and inguinal surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese de Pênis / Esfíncter Urinário Artificial / Implante Peniano / Disfunção Erétil Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese de Pênis / Esfíncter Urinário Artificial / Implante Peniano / Disfunção Erétil Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article