Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community Health Worker Self-Management Support Intervention Among Low-Income Adults With Diabetes, Seattle, Washington, 2010-2014.
Nelson, Karin; Taylor, Leslie; Silverman, Julie; Kiefer, Meghan; Hebert, Paul; Lessler, Dan; Krieger, James.
Afiliação
  • Nelson K; VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington.
  • Taylor L; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, General Internal Medicine Service, Seattle, Washington.
  • Silverman J; University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
  • Kiefer M; University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.
  • Hebert P; VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington.
  • Lessler D; VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington.
  • Krieger J; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, General Internal Medicine Service, Seattle, Washington.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 14: E15, 2017 02 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182863
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Community health workers (CHWs) can improve diabetes outcomes; however, questions remain about translating research findings into practical low-intensity models for safety-net providers. We tested the effectiveness of a home-based low-intensity CHW intervention for improving health outcomes among low-income adults with diabetes.

METHODS:

Low-income patients with glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 8.0% or higher in the 12 months before enrollment from 3 safety-net providers were randomized to a 12-month CHW-delivered diabetes self-management intervention or usual care. CHWs were based at a local health department. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline enrollment to 12 months; secondary outcomes included blood pressure and lipid levels, quality of life, and health care use.

RESULTS:

The change in HbA1c in the intervention group (n = 145) (unadjusted mean of 9.09% to 8.58%, change of -0.51) compared with the control group (n = 142) (9.04% to 8.71%, change of -0.33) was not significant (P = .54). In an analysis of participants with poor glycemic control (HbA1c >10%), the intervention group had a 1.23-point greater decrease in HbA1c compared with controls (P = .046). For the entire study population, we found a decrease in reported physician visits (P < .001) and no improvement in health-related quality of life (P = .07) in the intervention group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION:

A low-intensity CHW-delivered intervention to support diabetes self-management did not significantly improve HbA1c relative to usual care. Among the subgroup of participants with poor glycemic control (HbA1c >10% at baseline), the intervention was effective.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pobreza / Agentes Comunitários de Saúde / Diabetes Mellitus / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pobreza / Agentes Comunitários de Saúde / Diabetes Mellitus / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article