Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Utility of a New Predicting Score for Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula Survival.
Martinez, Lucia I; Esteve, Vicent; Yeste, Montserrat; Artigas, Vicent; Llagostera, Secundino.
Afiliação
  • Martinez LI; Vascular Surgery Department, Hospital of Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Barcelona, Spain; Surgery Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: LIMartinez@CST.CAT.
  • Esteve V; Nephrology Department, Hospital of Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Yeste M; Vascular Surgery Department, Hospital of Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Artigas V; General Surgery Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Llagostera S; Vascular Surgery Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 41: 56-61, 2017 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28238926
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) is the recommended first choice for vascular access (VA). The CAVeA2T2 scoring system was recently published (ipsilateral central venous catheter access, age >73 years, vein <2.2 mm, lower limb angioplasty, and absent intraoperative thrill). The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical utility of the CAVeA2T2 scoring system for predicting RC-AVFs survival in our center and its subsequent application in VA management. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

In this single-center retrospective study, all RC-AVFs performed from January 2010 to July 2014 were included. The CAVeA2T2 was applied. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were measured.

RESULTS:

Sixty RC-AVFs were analyzed. Mean age was 64.3 ± 14.7 years. Mean CAVeA2T2 score was 1.23 ± 1.2. The median fistula secondary patency was 13.7 ± 1.6 months. Secondary patency was at 6 weeks and at 6, 12, and 24 months 88.3%, 66.7%, 55%, and 31.7%, respectively. Increasing score (≥2) was associated with a decrease in primary (log-rank, χ2 = 16.7, dif = 1, P = 0.0001) and secondary patency rate survival (log-rank, χ2 = 5.4, dif = 1, P = 0.0001). In addition, stratification of the CAVeA2T2 score into 3 groups (scores 0-1, 2, and 3+) retained its significance for primary (log-rank, χ2 = 19.4, dif = 2, P = 0.0001) and secondary patency rate survival (log-rank, χ2 = 5.5, dif = 2, P = 0.046) at the end of the study.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the present study, the CAVeA2T2 scoring system has proved to be a useful, easy to apply tool that is highly predictive of RC-AVF survival. Based on our results, we should avoid perform RC-AVFs, in those patients with CAVeA2T2 score ≥2 and late nephrology referral. Prospective studies should be designed to establish the management of patients with a higher CAVeA2T2 score.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias / Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Diálise Renal / Artéria Radial / Extremidade Superior Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias / Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Diálise Renal / Artéria Radial / Extremidade Superior Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article