Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Audit of Second-Trimester Fetal Anomaly Scans Based on a Novel Image-Scoring Method in the Southwest Region of the Netherlands.
Ursem, Nicolette T C; Peters, Ingrid A; Kraan-van der Est, Mieke N; Reijerink-Verheij, Jacqueline C I Y; Knapen, Maarten F C M; Cohen-Overbeek, Titia E.
Afiliação
  • Ursem NTC; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Peters IA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Kraan-van der Est MN; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Reijerink-Verheij JCIY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Knapen MFCM; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Cohen-Overbeek TE; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Ultrasound Med ; 36(6): 1171-1179, 2017 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28299806
OBJECTIVES: Since 2007 the second-trimester fetal anomaly scan is offered to all pregnant women as part of the national prenatal screening program in the Netherlands. Dutch population-based screening programs generally have a well-described system to achieve quality assurance. Because of the absence of a uniform system to monitor the actual performance of the fetal anomaly scan in 2012, we developed a standardized image-scoring method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning performance of all sonographers in the southwestern region of the Netherlands using this image-scoring method. METHODS: Each sonographer was requested to set up a digital portfolio. A portfolio consists of five logbooks from five different pregnant women, each containing 25 fetal anatomical structures and six biometric measures of randomly selected fetal anomaly scans. RESULTS: During the study period, 425 logbooks of 85 sonographers were assessed as part of the audit process. Seventy-three out of 85 sonographers (86%) met the criteria in the primary audit, and 12 sonographers required individual hands-on training. A successful assessment was achieved for 11 sonographers in the re-audit and one sonographer ceased her contract. Moreover, 2.1% of the required images were not digitally stored and therefore could not be reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Quality assessment using the image-scoring method demonstrated that most of the sonographers met the expectations of the audit process, but those who had subpar performance met the expectations after retraining.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Competência Clínica / Doenças Fetais / Auditoria Médica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Competência Clínica / Doenças Fetais / Auditoria Médica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article