Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Leaving the Skin Incision Open May Not Be as Beneficial as We Have Been Taught.
He, Jack C; Zosa, Brenda M; Schechtman, David; Brajcich, Brian; Savakus, Jonathan C; Wojahn, Amanda L; Wang, Derek Z; Claridge, Jeffrey A.
Afiliação
  • He JC; Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Zosa BM; Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Schechtman D; Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Brajcich B; Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Savakus JC; Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Wojahn AL; Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Wang DZ; Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Claridge JA; Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, Ohio.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 18(4): 431-439, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28332921
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Currently, various methods of skin closures are used in contaminated and dirty abdominal wounds without solid, evidence-based guidance. This study investigates whether closure methods affect surgical site infection (SSI) and other incisional complications. We hypothesize that open management of the skin would have the lowest complications, including SSI. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients age ≥18 who underwent trauma laparotomy (TL) or damage control laparotomy (DCL) from 2008-2013 and had class III/IV wounds were included. Demographic, injury, treatment, and outcome variables were compared based on skin closure

methods:

Primary closure, intermittently stapled with wicks, or open management. Subgroup analyses for TL, DCL, and high-risk patients with stomach, colon, or rectal injuries were performed. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analyses were performed to identify risk factors for superficial/deep SSI and surgical incision complications.

RESULTS:

A total of 348 patients were included. The median age was 47 years; 14% were female; 21% had blunt injuries. Overall SSI was highest for open incisions (p < 0.05), but there was no difference in superficial/deep SSI. Primary closures healed a median of 20 days, compared with 68 and 71 days for the intermittently stapled and open groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Primary closure in TL and high-risk patients also had the lowest SSI rates (all p < 0.05), but there were no differences in superficial/deep SSI in any subgroup. In TL patients, diabetes mellitus and colon injuries were independently associated with the development of superficial/deep SSI and surgical incision complications; however, skin closure method was not.

CONCLUSION:

In class III and IV wounds, primary closure was associated with the lowest SSI, shortest length of stay and healing time. Method of skin closure, however, did not have an independent effect on the development of superficial/deep SSI or surgical incision complications. These suggest that primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal wounds may be performed more safely than commonly perceived.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Pós-Operatórios / Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica / Ferida Cirúrgica Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Pós-Operatórios / Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica / Ferida Cirúrgica Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article